Peterson 1, then Marvin Austin in the 3rd.

[teeray]

I have been pounding on the QB thing all week but if we don't take one I would like to see Fairley at #1 but I won't cry if we take Peterson.

If Austin makes it to the third (which he really could) he would be a steal. He was the number 1 DT going into the season.

[Baschski]

Re-signing Marshall would be a very good move for us. He's a solid corner and will thrive in a more aggressive defense. It also drops CB way down the "needs" list.

[KillerKat]

If they're going to keep Smith and don't want to try to get extra picks in this years draft by trading him after getting Green (assuming a CBA is done by then)....then the best move would be to pick Patrick Peterson. Way more FA DTs available than CBs to fill that hole.

[KillerKat]

Also...Marshall sucks and most likely wont be here cause of that...

[KaseKlosed]

umm theres no need for Peterson right now, theres not a WR in our division that requires a shut down corner to cover him, we need a DT, either Fairly or a Vet, kase klosed

[SgtJoo]

It's all conjecture at this point, his guess is as good as anyone else's.

[Gscottnc5]

If you can't stop the run, the pass defense doesn't matter

[mick eye]

I call BS. People have said the following. We need two DT's. DT then CB in the third. If we cant stop the run pass defense don't matter. There is not a WR in our division that needs a shut down corner.

First yeah we need two DT's but they don't have to be Fairley and whoever. There is gonna be talent in FA and at the top of the third at DT. Corner not so much. Second, how bout CB, then DT in the third. Thirdly, wow that is a word. Your wrong. Why do you think the JETS have went out of there way to acquire every corner talent they can? It's cause yes the trenches are important but so is the other facets of the game. Lastly did i miss something? Are we NOT in the same division as the freaking SAINTS, Roddy White, and Buccs Mike Williams. We need pass defense. Don't kid yourself thinking nick fairley is gonna manhandle NFL Olineman like college kids.

When you look at raw talent that can be coached into greatness i see Patrick Peterson and AJ Green not Nick and CAm.

[pantherclaw]

Cannot pick, based upon need. Have to go BPA.

Whomever is going to be on the top of THEIR board, regardless of need.

[TANTRIC-NINJA]

Agreed. I really like Peterson. He is very nice talent at a position that is hard to find true quality. I would like Peterson or Green before Fairley.

U argument is valid.......in 2009! again..the draft doesn't have to be the place to fix things.

Cbs more broke than U realize.

[TANTRIC-NINJA]

umm theres no need for Peterson right now, theres not a WR in our division that requires a shut down corner to cover him, we need a DT, either Fairly or a Vet, kase klosed

Kase Klo-FAIL!

Roddy White

Colston-Henderson-Meacham-Moore

Mike Williams-Benn(2011?)

We do need A DT! But your post now has no meaning.

[Jackofalltrades]

Kase Klo-FAIL!

Roddy White

Colston-Henderson-Meacham-Moore

Mike Williams-Benn(2011?)

We do need A DT! But your post now has no meaning.

Marvin Austin won't see the third round.

[MadHatter]

We have to shore up the DT position before drafting another CB at #1. You can have shut down corners....but if you have poo on the line your defense will get toasted.....see the Bengals.

[panthers55]

We have to shore up the DT position before drafting another CB at #1. You can have shut down corners....but if you have poo on the line your defense will get toasted.....see the Bengals.

At the time the Jets picked Revis they didn't need Dts or other pieces on their team. We can get by with the corners we have but not our DTs, plain and simple. Peterson would be a great luxury to draft and would surely be an upgrade. But as Madhatter said, even a shut down corner is only average or worse if the opposing offense has all day to throw the ball. Unless we can pressure on the QB, it doesn't matter how good our corners are.