Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So hypothetically speaking

KDawg004

By KDawg004,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

KDawg004 Rookie

KDawg004

Posted
Posted

In no way am I on the Newton badnwagon. Just something to take into consideration.

Say we do go ahead and get a stop-gap QB for a year or two. Wouldn't it be logical to draft Newton considering he already has the elite physical tools to work with? Now obviously the FO must think they can develop the mental part of his game like going through every progression, reading defenses, etc. From what I've read it's not that he's not smart enough to learn but more that he is a blank canvas since he has never had to do it.

On the other hand we draft Green, Peterson or Fairley. We have another lousy year and are in a position to draft Luck, Barkley or Jones. But what would happen if they don't make the immediate leap to the NFL or end up not living up to the potential and expectations as many QBs do? (i.e. Clausen "the most pro ready QB") Thus losing another year developing what would be our franchise QB Newton.

Another problem would be our stop-gap QB leading us to a 6-10 or better record and eliminating us from any position to draft our so called franchise QB. Do you mortgage the future to trade up and snag him, pray from someone to fall, turn to Clausen, or stay mediocore?

Again not on the Newton bandwagon. Just want to know everyones thoughts. Ofcourse, stiring up the pot too :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

This year, 6-10 landed anywhere from 7th to 13th. Plenty of franchise QBs have been taken in that period I think, but I could be wrong. :)

The thing is, no matter who we take, it'll be a risk. They could bust. Newton could bust this year. Luck could bust next year. Whoever we take wherever they are could bust.

The question is if they would rather work on developing the QBs they have now and then, if that doesn't turn out well, try again, or if they should take this opportunity to grab what they can and hope for the best.

I am not sure what to do myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Actually, no. It isn't logical.

If they sign a stopgap, then essentially this will be Clausen's "make or break" year. The veteran signee will be a failsafe in case Clausen doesn't prove himself worthy.

Let's suppose for a moment that Clausen actually does prove to be worth something though. If you drafted a QB at number one, then you've used a pick on a guy you don't need when it could have gone to upgrade another spot like DT or CB.

Like it or not folks, Clausen will get his shot with the current staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KDawg004 Rookie

KDawg004

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Actually, no. It isn't logical.

If they sign a stopgap, then essentially this will be Clausen's "make or break" year. The veteran signee will be a failsafe in case Clausen doesn't prove himself worthy.

Let's suppose for a moment that Clausen actually does prove to be worth something though. If you drafted a QB at number one, then you've used a pick on a guy you don't need when it could have gone to upgrade another spot like DT or CB.

Like it or not folks, Clausen will get his shot with the current staff.

Ofcourse Clausen will get another shot deservingly so. But Hurney saying QB is our no.1 need isn't exactly a vote of confidence.

Having Clausen workout with Newton waiting in the wings is not a bad problem to have. We would be in a situation like Philly where teams are constantly inquiring about their QBs. Although that is a huge risk to take with the #1 pick in the draft. Especially with elite athletes sitting there at positions of need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Rookie

teeray

Posted
Posted

This year, 6-10 landed anywhere from 7th to 13th. Plenty of franchise QBs have been taken in that period I think, but I could be wrong. :)

The thing is, no matter who we take, it'll be a risk. They could bust. Newton could bust this year. Luck could bust next year. Whoever we take wherever they are could bust.

The question is if they would rather work on developing the QBs they have now and then, if that doesn't turn out well, try again, or if they should take this opportunity to grab what they can and hope for the best.

I am not sure what to do myself.

It is my personal quest in life to get you on the Cam bandwagon. Come join us. It is nice.

For the record i have never gone to bat this much for a QB in my life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Rookie

teeray

Posted
Posted

Ofcourse Clausen will get another shot deservingly so. But Hurney saying QB is our no.1 need isn't exactly a vote of confidence.

Having Clausen workout with Newton waiting in the wings is not a bad problem to have. We would be in a situation like Philly where teams are constantly inquiring about their QBs. Although that is a huge risk to take with the #1 pick in the draft. Especially with elite athletes sitting there at positions of need.

If Clausen proves he is worth something you have a lot of value in either Clausen or Cam down the road. if you don't screw it up like San Diego did with Brees and Rivers you can pick up players/picks with this asset. Not the worst position to be in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nationsford Newbie

nationsford

Posted
Posted

anti-newtons i see... we get to pick anyone.... so we pick the best player at the worst position(happens to be the most important), period. God only knows whats ahead in next years draft to many variables the world may end by then. The fact that they were going to draft luck puts to rest the "give clausen another year" talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
King Taharqa Newbie

King Taharqa

Posted
Posted

anti-newtons i see... we get to pick anyone.... so we pick the best player at the worst position(happens to be the most important), period. God only knows whats ahead in next years draft to many variables the world may end by then. The fact that they were going to draft luck puts to rest the "give clausen another year" talk.

This is the best offseason in Panther history. I love the exposure our franchise and fanbase is getting. I love people are getting to see how we really feel and what really scares us. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
theyhateme45 Newbie

theyhateme45

Posted
Posted

Actually, no. It isn't logical.

If they sign a stopgap, then essentially this will be Clausen's "make or break" year. The veteran signee will be a failsafe in case Clausen doesn't prove himself worthy.

Let's suppose for a moment that Clausen actually does prove to be worth something though. If you drafted a QB at number one, then you've used a pick on a guy you don't need when it could have gone to upgrade another spot like DT or CB.

Like it or not folks, Clausen will get his shot with the current staff.

I'm gonna respectfully disagree with you on that. If we have two great QB's on our roster then we can choose which we want, and trade a proven young QB stud for a ridiculous price!!!

Extra young QB with high upside, showed they can be a franchise QB... Were getting more than a first and a third!!! Meaning not a wasted pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basbear
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Basbear · Posted

      Best I heard its a clause the bungals want to add. It prevents them form paying the full guaranteed amount if triggered. No one knows the details of the clause, but guesses are it relates to off-field stuff. Stewart is in the right here. Before they signed burrow, chase, and Higgins they were the cheapest team in the league bar none. Unlike tepper or jarrah Jones or any other NFL ownership, all Mike brown owns is the beagals. Every other owner has many other money making businesses, not bungals.  I still remember when Brenston Bunker was starting on WFNZ and he told the story about the beagals telling him to pick a used cup form a huge pile, LOLS! They been on hard knocks and I remember Marvin lewis telling the players not to take home Gatorade bottles........* but in that case, I believe some players were taking a back pack and filling it up with drinks. Still you make millions(around 200million) in net profit and Im sure coke gave the team those bottles, still... Its a 32 team billion business, someone has to the cheapest.....Panthers were around the next cheapest team before tepper bought them and he has POURED millions upon millions into the team. He bought a bubble that Richardson never would, so the team had to gather in building during the rain. He spent millions on coofus machines that he just gave away like the bubble. Tepper made that AC trailer a thing. I've trashed him about his concerts and taking away end zone seats from fans. But the guy will spend money any way to efforts to better the team, dang I just remembered the deal he gave Rhule- more than Andy Reid at the time.  I know results have not came, but Id 100% take Tepper over Mike brown as a owner.
    • PNW_PantherMan
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      There's no way they're shipping you some uniform you haven't seen lol.  I feel like they'd just refund you and ask if you wanted the new one when it launched. Probably just making the blues the primary, or a new helmet for a new alternate/variation.
    • Basbear
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Basbear · Posted

      Man even after 5-12 seasons they are able to produce hype videos. 
×
×
  • Create New...