PANTHERS @ HURRICANES ROUND 3 GAME 1

[DavidEng]

7 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

He had a turnover on all three goals he was on the ice for. Plus he had that god awful delay of game penalty. Like legit his GS actually shows he was the cause of the loss and he was only on the ice for 12 minutes. You remove him from that game and the Canes win or at worst go to OT. 

Let's put this in perspective, in 12 minutes he directly led to 3 goals against. In the 48 minutes without him on the ice it was an even-steven 2-2 game and that's disregarding that god awful delay of game penalty that led to goal number 4 of the 5 given up. 

 

 

I don't see how anyone could say that he didn't directly lead to the loss. 

 

Because people don’t always share the same opinion and some of your claims I don’t agree with.

Find a mirror and argue away since you can’t accept others can have different opinions lol.

[carpanfan96]

31 minutes ago, DavidEng said:

Because people don’t always share the same opinion and some of your claims I don’t agree with.

Find a mirror and argue away since you can’t accept others can have different opinions lol.

Not an opinion though.

He was factually directly responsible for 3 goals. 

He was factually -3 in 12 minutes of ice time.

He factually had a -4.5GS.

It's a fact that in the 48 minutes without him on the Ice the game was a 2-2 draw with the Canes generally dominating play. 

Those are all facts and not one of them is any sort of an opinion. 

Let's dig deeper into facts tho. 

Using his game score and it's statistics. 

-.08 off

-.07 def

-1.5 net

His GF% was -.33

His GA+/- was -3.208

His XGF was .41

His XGA was .47 

So based on his logged ice time and the situations he was in, he should have been an even player net based on expected goals for and against. 

Yet factually he wasn't.

 

So yes the evidence shows that he factually was the major reason the Canes lost. 

 

Deal with it or not but those are the facts. 

Edited 7 hours ago by carpanfan96

[PNW_PantherMan]