Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Day 3 Mini camp tweets


Recommended Posts

Mike Kaye
@mike_e_kaye
·
3h
Tetairoa McMillan and Nick Scott here but not practicing, Jimmy Horn in uniform but working on adjacent field with trainer, JJ Jansen and Matthew Wright are approved absences. #Panthers

 

Joe Person
@josephperson
·
3h
Tetairoa McMillan gets another day. We will see him again in five weeks.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Kaye
@mike_e_kaye
·
2h
Christian Rozeboom broke up a pass over the middle by Bryce Young in 11 on 11. UDFA DB Isaac Gifford nearly came up with the pick. #Panthers

 


Alex Zietlow
@alexzietlow05
·
2h
11s work: #Panthers QB Bryce Young fires a pass over the middle that’s deflected by LB Christian Rozeboom. The ball flies in the air and then slips through S Isaac Gifford’s hands for a near-INT.

Young follows that up with a slant to Adam Thielen that goes for a big gain.

 


Alex Zietlow
@alexzietlow05
·
2h
Mike Jackson then picks off Young.

 

Mike Kaye
@mike_e_kaye
·
2h
James Mitchell with a catch off a Bryce throw in the seam. Then Mike Jackson picks off BY9 in the flat on a target to RB Rico Dowdle. Mike read it the whole way. #Panthers

 


Joe Person
@josephperson
·
2h
Mike Jackson picks off Bryce Young in the EZ. Jackson ran all the way to the other end zone. He would not have been able to do that had it been a real game. Still, nice play.

 

 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

interesting

 


Mike Kaye
@mike_e_kaye
·
3h
We’ve only been to five open workouts but it sure seems like the #Panthers prefer Brady Christensen as an OT as opposed to an IOL at least based on the small sample size.

I get that his measurables day IOL but his playing style and skill set say OT. I'd use him as a backup swing tackle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I get that his measurables day IOL but his playing style and skill set say OT. I'd use him as a backup swing tackle. 

Should have signed him to a longer term deal to replace Moton after this year

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/12/2025 at 3:08 PM, Captain Morgan said:

interesting

 


Mike Kaye
@mike_e_kaye
·
3h
We’ve only been to five open workouts but it sure seems like the #Panthers prefer Brady Christensen as an OT as opposed to an IOL at least based on the small sample size.

Yosh Nijmon is basically the only other guy they have that has shown he can play tackle behind the starters. It makes sense that Brady's being used more at Tackle with Mays and Zavala improving and Corbett being healthy. Those guys will play center or back up our guards more than likely.

Edited by Iceup
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Iceup said:

Yosh Nijmon is basically the only other guy they have that has shown he can play tackle behind the starters. It makes sense that Brady's being used more at Tackle with Mays and Zavala improving and Corbett being healthy. Those guys will play center or back up our guards more than likely.

Yep. It's the right move IMO. We have more depth at IOL and BC's skill set plays better at OT despite his measurables saying IOL.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/12/2025 at 7:24 PM, toldozer said:

Should have signed him to a longer term deal to replace Moton after this year

they have to be grooming him to compete for it.  I think a few of us were saying the depth at G and need at OT would pull him out there--he is probably at his best at T, but we hope his best is good enough.  that is why I would hesitate to draft older players--they can't take 3 years to develop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...