Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Ringer NFC Offseason podcast


mrcompletely11
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 6/24/2025 at 3:48 PM, WUnderhill said:

I haven’t listened, but based on who is posting this you just know it’s gonna be scratching his anti-Bryce itch. Can’t wait for the season.

Seeing as how big brother Bryce hater immediately slid in to wax poetic about "waiting and seeing" (after spending the entire offseason doing the opposite), I've got a feeling we’ll be hearing the same old gospel soon:

  • Tampa is the clear division favorite
  • Bryce has size limitations
  • And of course: "They gave up too much for him, so he must throw for 300+ every game or it wasn’t worth it"

I've developed a bit more of an exotic palate than some, though--so while some might fear the taste of crow, I've grown rather fond of it over the years. Hopefully I'll be having a nibble after listening, but I've got a feeling they'll have more salt in their diet than I will crow... 😉

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is which Bryce shows up game 1. Do we get week 2 (2024) Bryce, or week 18 (2024) Bryce? 

I will say that his progression after the benching last year was amazing. He literally got better every game - sans Dallas. Like every week he did something we hadn't seen him do before. And it wasn't luck, toss it up for grabs plays like Penix did against Carolina. Penix was just throwing the ball as hard as he could in the direction of a receiver and hoping they'd make a play for him. What we saw from Bryce was different. Decision making, reading defenses, recognizing blitzes and where they were coming from, knowing his hot, avoiding pressure and manipulating the pocket, throwing with anticipation, taking shots downfield, and running the ball surprisingly well. Stats don't always tell the story. Did he miss some throws that he should have made - sure did. But the clutch gene is strong with this one. One score game and Carolina has the ball with 2 minutes on the clock - I'm confident he'll give them a chance to win more than he doesn't. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/24/2025 at 9:50 PM, Joe Bear said:

I don't really care what Youtubers think. Young will either resemble Weeks 1-2 more, or Weeks 14-18 more. We don't know yet. Probably a mix of both would be my guess.

I consider last year Bryce's rookie year.....and I expect some regression/D adjustment in his second season in Canales' O.  Film is film.   So yeah, I agree....he won't be the dude that opened up the year week 1 or closed the door week 17.  We will get some dude in between it all most likely.  Which IMO puts us in a really awkward no man's land with Bryce. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its really wild to watch this part of the community boil down the success of the 2025 Panthers to whether or not BY9 busts or breaks out.

Ill take middle of the road mistake free game manager that distributes the ball and orchestrates the offense.  If we can get that with a D that doesnt put us in a 27 point+ hole every week the team can improve.

Id love a deep post season run but honestly at this point Id be ecstatic about feeling like we could win every week.

 

Jake is never going to get a yellow jacket but damn if he didnt make watching the team fun.

 

 

eta: I think too many people are looking for an I told you so moment over their pre-draft "evaluation" of Bryce

Edited by HaricotVert
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

I consider last year Bryce's rookie year.....and I expect some regression/D adjustment in his second season in Canales' O.  Film is film.   So yeah, I agree....he won't be the dude that opened up the year week 1 or closed the door week 17.  We will get some dude in between it all most likely.  Which IMO puts us in a really awkward no man's land with Bryce. 

 

The nightmare scenario

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, HaricotVert said:

Its really wild to watch this part of the community boil down the success of the 2025 Panthers to whether or not BY9 busts or breaks out.

Ill take middle of the road mistake free game manager that distributes the ball and orchestrates the offense.  If we can get that with a D that doesnt put us in a 27 point+ hole every week the team can improve.

Id love a deep post season run but honestly at this point Id be ecstatic about feeling like we could win every week.

 

Jake is never going to get a yellow jacket but damn if he didnt make watching the team fun.

 

 

eta: I think too many people are looking for an I told you so moment over their pre-draft "evaluation" of Bryce

I dont think "game managers" make playoff runs in the modern nfl.  And looking across the league I dont see many winning their division.  You need elite qb play.  Can bryce do it, sure maybe, has he done it, maybe in spurts so this year we shall see.

 

***and I guess its all relative to how you quantify the term "game manager" which to date he most certainly be.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

I consider last year Bryce's rookie year.....and I expect some regression/D adjustment in his second season in Canales' O.  Film is film.   So yeah, I agree....he won't be the dude that opened up the year week 1 or closed the door week 17.  We will get some dude in between it all most likely.  Which IMO puts us in a really awkward no man's land with Bryce. 

 

Ive said all offseason I truly think by week 5 we know what we have in bryce, DC and this team in general.  If we cannot get at least 2 wins in the first 4 weeks then oh boy it may be another long one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I dont think "game managers" make playoff runs in the modern nfl.  And looking across the league I dont see many winning their division.  You need elite qb play.  Can bryce do it, sure maybe, has he done it, maybe in spurts so this year we shall see.

 

***and I guess its all relative to how you quantify the term "game manager" which to date he most certainly be.

Would you really put Foles or Stafford on the elite list?  They are(were) good, but elite?  Throw in some guys who got there and lost and its a respectable list of QBs not named Brady and Mahommes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, HaricotVert said:

Would you really put Foles or Stafford on the elite list?  They are(were) good, but elite?  Throw in some guys who got there and lost and its a respectable list of QBs not named Brady and Mahommes

Foles would be the aberation and yes Stafford is/was elite.  His stats in the 2021 season kindof proves it.  4888 yards, 41 tds, 9 in the playoffs with a 70% completion.  Yeah thats next level

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...