Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show


Puresteel55
 Share

Recommended Posts

I thought Shedeur looked better than expected and hope he takes the QB1 spot in Cleveland...

...but man, the amount of glazing he is getting for scoring on 2 of 6 drives (one of them starting from the Carolina 10) against what was a historically bad defense is a bit goofy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Icege said:

I thought Shedeur looked better than expected and hope he takes the QB1 spot in Cleveland...

...but man, the amount of glazing he is getting for scoring on 2 of 6 drives (one of them starting from the Carolina 10) against what was a historically bad defense is a bit goofy.

You of all people talking about someone else glazing a young QB based on a small sample size.

Michael Jordan Lol GIF

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

He struggled against starters? He got the offense to the Panthers 21, where Stefanski in his infinite wisdom went into an empty set, where Wonnum, I believe, made it into the backfield virtually untouched in about 0.62 seconds. 

The first drive should have been extended but Johnson missed a catch and I believe their tight end, or slot receiver, didn't get the correct depth on a hitch. 

I don't think he struggled against any of the Panthers defense if I'm being honest. And if that's what his struggling looks like, then trade for him now. I've seen struggle the past two years, that wasn't it. 

3/7 for 26 yards against the starters

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

He struggled against starters? He got the offense to the Panthers 21, where Stefanski in his infinite wisdom went into an empty set, where Wonnum, I believe, made it into the backfield virtually untouched in about 0.62 seconds. 

The first drive should have been extended but Johnson missed a catch and I believe their tight end, or slot receiver, didn't get the correct depth on a hitch. 

I don't think he struggled against any of the Panthers defense if I'm being honest. And if that's what his struggling looks like, then trade for him now. I've seen struggle the past two years, that wasn't it. 

Why are you so focused on a Browns QB anyways?

You've spent weeks badmouthing our rookie WR who had yet to play a down in an NFL game then when he finally did and looked good you went completely silent. Odd.

Edited by frankw
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, Sanders had a very nice debut preseason performance but the folks acting like he's arrived based on that performance are getting way out ahead of themselves.

The media is going to overreact to his play because of his name.  He did play solid against our backups.  Stayed calm in the pocket and made some nice passes.  I still think he can be a solid QB in this league, but it's just hard for me to dig too much into preseason.  I'd consider putting him behind Flacco if I were the Browns and once they get eliminated playing him to see what they have in him.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

The media is going to overreact to his play because of his name.  He did play solid against our backups.  Stayed calm in the pocket and made some nice passes.  I still think he can be a solid QB in this league, but it's just hard for me to dig too much into preseason.  I'd consider putting him behind Flacco if I were the Browns and once they get eliminated playing him to see what they have in him.

That'd be my plan. Figure out which one of your rookie QBs has the most upside/potential and throw him out there once the season is basically over.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

The media is going to overreact to his play because of his name.  He did play solid against our backups.  Stayed calm in the pocket and made some nice passes.  I still think he can be a solid QB in this league, but it's just hard for me to dig too much into preseason.  I'd consider putting him behind Flacco if I were the Browns and once they get eliminated playing him to see what they have in him.

Best bet imo. Last thing they want to do is have to protect Shedeur while still having to build the team. Let Flacco guide the ship and then give Shedeur the keys once they're eliminated.

Of course, they could always do the Huddle-preferred method of forcing him into action because his last name is Sanders and that means he has to play hero ball. 🙃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Lol...hardly any rookie is gonna get playing time against starters in the pre season. So I guess there is nothing to evaluate for respective teams right?  Makes sense i guess. Lol

I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...