Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking


fieryprophet
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, strato said:

I’d say it is easier than making anything off Spotify. They are thieves. 

I have never understood how the labels negotiated the kinds of deals they did for the paltry rates that Spotify pays until it became obvious that they were getting the lion's share of the revenue and the actual artists couldn't do anything about it.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

We should have brought one in last season for no other reason than if we were to make a playoff run with an improved Bryce from last year, you dont throw that away with an ancient Andy Dalton who already showed he's not capable of more than taking snaps if Bryce were injured. 

He has yet to earn his job. I do t think he could have beat Andy out is a fair competition. Honestly not exaggerating.

They could in no way have someone with NFL QB skills showing him up to the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, fieryprophet said:

I have never understood how the labels negotiated the kinds of deals they did for the paltry rates that Spotify pays until it became obvious that they were getting the lion's share of the revenue and the actual artists couldn't do anything about it.

I see people with a million plays saying they get next to nothing off of them. 
The internet has in one way destroyed the gate keeping of the record industry and has allowed so many people to reach audiences, but we sort of needed that gatekeeping too. 
I want to say it is like college sports, the money makers subsidized a ton a great jazz artists and other fringe genres. 
 

Most musicians now are relegated to playing for their supper so to speak.  
Which, historically that is what it always was. I mean, you had patrons, you had the church and with paper and ink you had the start of publishing.
Audio recording technology spawned a bubble in time where they could get obscenely wealthy off publishing royalties and to a degree, album sales. 

It is going back to the old way it seems. But now, there are fewer and fewer musicians who can play an instrument and get a track down live in one take. It’s all synthetic. Boo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

The one firm conclusion I have come to this season isn't so much about Young, but Canales. From what I've seen over the past two years, I think his offseason preparation program sucks. The team comes into the season looking shoddy and unprepared...

But then things pick up a few weeks in 😕

Maybe what he needs is a more experienced (and successful) past head coach on staff or consulting who can help him build a more effective offseason program combination of camp, OTAs, etc so we can leave the slow starts behind.

Here's hoping...

The CBA changes to offseason rules regarding live contact, practice time limits, etc. over the last decade cannot be overstated on its impact for younger players in particular. The players union is heavily weighted towards the interests of veteran players, who are concerned with staying healthy and on the field, compared to rookies and bubble players who need more development time and live-fire experience, but that has been bargained out over the years. Not saying that absolves Canales of this team's clear tendency to show up unprepared for the start of seasons but it does mean the entire coaching staff gets less to work with to mitigate it (which should have meant adjusting by more reps in the preseason for the starters at least.)

Edited by fieryprophet
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, fieryprophet said:

The CBA changes to offseason rules regarding live contact, practice time limits, etc. over the last decade cannot be overstated on its impact for younger players in particular. The players union is heavily weighted towards the interests of veteran players, who are concerned with staying healthy and on the field, compared to rookies and bubble players who need more development time and live-fire experience, but that has been bargained out over the years. Not saying that absolves Canales of this team's clear tendency to show up unprepared for the start of seasons but it does mean the entire coaching staff gets less to work with to mitigate it (which should have meant adjusting by more reps in the preseason for the starters at least.)

I am in agreement all the way with that. Combined with the NFL’s greed with the schedule - cutting the preseason - the quality of play over the first two to three weeks of the season has really fallen off. 
I wasn’t too worried because for one, everyone has to deal with it, and for other we aren’t competing for real yet so use the preseason to evaluate your depth and make the best roster decisions. 
The fans get lesser quality football, but the fans seem to always come last with the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

I love how the “OGs” boast of working at PFF means something (to him). 
 

I’ve been on this board for 20+ years, and it’s never not been a collection of dummies, smart asses, and whiny babies - including myself. But it’s good banter for the most part. 
 

If someone was truly a guru at football and was wasting their time spewing it here instead of turning it into millions of dollars running a team or coaching a position, that says more about them than any of the “idiots” on this board. 

I agree, It's weird how sensitive people are here. Its a fugging internet sports forum. There should be sh*t talking...lots of it. The huddle is pretty tame compared to my friends and I when we gets to talkin sports. Most of my friends are bitch ass eagles fans and they're always squawkin.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, strato said:

I bet my opinion of ‘why’ will not align with yours.
 

I see it as people are resorting to arguing false premises.
We see it daily in the real world. 

Their motivations are what they are, I could say it is because the real doesn’t favor their feelings. But I can’t really know that. I don’t know why a person resorts to that but it happens all the time. 
 

PS and BTW, Underhill wasn’t alone in arguing that, and I don’t think he was the instigator, he picked up the torch. 
 

I take back my apologies to these folks because now I see what their claims were based on. False premises. 

Speaking of false premises, I literally said “his rookie year” in my posts and you are arguing over something said a week ago as if that is what I was referring to. I tried to stop talking to you since you admitted yourself it’s pointless, but you just can’t stop running your mouth and bullshitting for some reason. We get it, you think you’re smart. Let me know when you’ve searched all the threads from 2023. I really don’t care enough to do it, but if you want to call me obtuse and all this stupid poo then you should put your money where your mouth is and prove it instead of just running off at the mouth. I wasn’t in here making anything personal or specific to you or anybody else, the only name I mentioned was MRenshaw who is a clear and known troll, but you seem to have taken it personally, so maybe you’re part of the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Shotgun said:

I agree, It's weird how sensitive people are here. Its a fugging internet sports forum. There should be sh*t talking...lots of it. The huddle is pretty tame compared to my friends and I when we gets to talkin sports. Most of my friends are bitch ass eagles fans and they're always squawkin.

It's always the biggest crybabies that are threatening to take their ball and go home too.

Well....go then, MFer. This place will still exist.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/16/2025 at 3:56 PM, fieryprophet said:

Making millions in the coaching/analysis side of football ….. you need a hell of a lot of luck and to know a lot of the right people. 

I don’t disagree.

But this guy said he worked at PFF. That’s about as good a “foot in the door” as you can have in a sporting world turned over analytic and as the unofficial, official voice of the NFL’s determination of who’s good and bad  

if he was as smart as he’s claiming to be, he’d have risen to the top at PFF and parlayed that into a front office job. 
 

But he didn’t, so he didn’t. And now he’s here like the rest of us dummies. Only difference is most of us know we’re dummies, we’re not here claiming to be a guru.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...