Official Week 10: Saints @ Panthers Gameday Thread

[electro's horse]

Guys defense have year of tape on Canales and Bryce.

This isn’t complicated. Neither are good and the nfl figured them out. 

[strato]

40 minutes ago, Mills said:

I agree to a point. Outside of TMac, We still have arguably the worst receiver room in the league. Legette is a certified Dykhead.

This offense should have always been built around speedy wideouts who can get separation to give ole Noodle arm a chance to be successful. He’d still probably throw behind them but at least he wouldn’t have an excuse 

I don’t see that he has one now.  First overall, can’t adapt? Fugetabboutit 

[BrewerHouseBeer]

I will not buy another ticket until Bryce is off this team. 

[strato]

5 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Guys defense have year of tape on Canales and Bryce.

This isn’t complicated. Neither are good and the nfl figured them out. 

So if you know Bryce will sink the ship but are essentially forced to play him… in a 3 point game, what do you do? You see what happens when you turn him loose to point guard. 
I can’t blame Canales for that sorry excuse for a football player he is forced to indulge. 
He may be crap too but he needs the rope to prove it with an actual QB. 

[electro's horse]

3 minutes ago, strato said:

So if you know Bryce will sink the ship but are essentially forced to play him… in a 3 point game, what do you do? You see what happens when you turn him loose to point guard. 
I can’t blame Canales for that sorry excuse for a football player he is forced to indulge. 
He may be crap too but he needs the rope to prove it with an actual QB. 

When I look at the panthers offense over the past two seasons I know I think “this guy has shown he deserves a chance to pick a qb and run another season with him.”

[strato]

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

When I look at the panthers offense over the past two seasons I know I think “this guy has shown he deserves a chance to pick a qb and run another season with him.”

I know what you think. You have said so often enough. I think it needs to be proven with a clean slate and not having to try to drag that fuging 180lb weight around. 
I think what I asked is what is he supposed to do? 

Edited 2 hours ago by strato

[electro's horse]

1 minute ago, strato said:

I know what you think. You have said so often enough. I think it needs to be proven with a clean slate and not having to try to drag that fuging 180lb weight around. 
I think what I asked is what is he supposed to do? 

He accepted the job. You don’t get to wash your hands with a hiring condition.

[strato]

Just now, electro's horse said:

He accepted the job. You don’t get to wash your hands with a hiring condition.

You are assuming you know the arrangement didn’t include a contingency providing that Bryce was unfixable.

The main justification to condemn him out of hand is to believe Bryce was fixable and he failed. 
If you don’t believe that, and I didn’t, judging him on that is unfair.
 

I know the other arguments. On balance and considering realistic alternatives, I am not sold. I need to see it under conditions more conducive to success than what is in place right now. No biggie. Just think he has a big time losing hand and what the hell can you do if you are in that position? 
I think you try to ride it out and hope you get better circumstances eventually. 
 

[electro's horse]

2 minutes ago, strato said:

You are assuming you know the arrangement didn’t include a contingency providing that Bryce was unfixable.

 

Buddy, listen, you are correct I can’t disprove an unknowable hypothetical. You keep trotting this out like it’s not a logical fallacy. You can’t disprove a negative.

If you want to cloak yourself in made up things I can’t prove are false then more power to you. 

all I’m doing is calling what I see, and i see a coach whos averaging less than two TDs a game on offense for the better part of two seasons.

But yeah maybe the guy who doesn’t have final roster say actually negotiated a secret clause that kicks in after two seasons of eating poo.

Sure thing pal. 

[strato]

Fig that attitude with your derisive crap. You ain’t perfect. 
 

Go round and round and your whole case is it was a money grab and Canales is too dumb to get a condition of employment that gives him life after Bryce. When the village football idiot could see that he ain’t t it and can’t be made into an NFL QB, but a pro coach can’t see that  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by strato

[electro's horse]

1 minute ago, strato said:

Fig that attitude with your derisive crap. You ain’t perfect. 

Strato you can’t prove that Dave doesn’t have an agreement where tepper gets to watch Nicole peg him if he keeps trotting out Bryce to lose.

[frankw]

If Canales goes so be it. The issue is getting a better candidate let alone a top candidate to want to coach here under the meddling Tepper's.

[fanpanther]

49 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Guys defense have year of tape on Canales and Bryce.

This isn’t complicated. Neither are good and the nfl figured them out. 

i disagree any coach that can win at the nfl level dispite byoung is impressive 

[electro's horse]

Oh please lose the locker room 

https://x.com/scott_fowler/status/1987641052480614589?s=46

Panthers OT Ickey Ekwonu said Carolina's lack of preparation was a factor in 17-7 loss to Saints today. I'm putting a longer quote than usual in here, for context, re: what he said about the Panthers' practices this past week.
Ekwonu: "We just weren't locked into the small details. And you know, a couple guys spoke about it. Coach spoke about it throughout the week. 
"And you can't get days back. You know, if you have a tough day on Thursday, tough day on Friday, or whatever, you can always look forward. But you can't get that day back. 
"So that preparation, or lack thereof, is going to add up. And unfortunately, that just cultivated to what we saw today."