Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charles Davis on WFNZ


Mother Grabber

Recommended Posts

Charles Davis is talking NFL Draft on WFNZ this afternoon. His soon to be released mock has us taking Cam Newton. He feels that Newton throws a better ball than Teabag or Young. The question that the Panthers need to answer is will he take the time to watch film and learn the footwork. He also noted that Bradford didn't take the ball under center either, so that should not be a deterrent. If he loves football and will take the time, then he'll learn that quickly enough. He also noted that he'd take Luck over Newton, if he were there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charles Davis is talking NFL Draft on WFNZ this afternoon. His soon to be released mock has us taking Cam Newton. He feels that Newton throws a better ball than Teabag or Young. The question that the Panthers need to answer is will he take the time to watch film and learn the footwork. He also noted that Bradford didn't take the ball under center either, so that should not be a deterrent. If he loves football and will take the time, then he'll learn that quickly enough. He also noted that he'd take Luck over Newton, if he were there.

Clearly he is racist. :rofl:

I wouldn't want The Golden Calf of Bristol or Young either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the fug are all these news?

Honestly?

He basically said the same poo everyone else did

Oh Great, he throws it better than The Golden Calf of Bristol and Vince Young, you know who else does?? EVERYONE!

Hate :) When are you going to accept my truce offer TRD. Let's end this madness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think by you saying it's a retarded question in your question, it leaves us little other options when describing the question.

Well I would do it Jeopardy style, but I'm too lazy. But really, Davis has let his own brothers and sisters in the media skew his view of Cam. Of course he'll bother to learn new footwork. Not saying it'll work, but dude ain't gonna just sit there. Then again, Smitty and Jarrett and a playbook come to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I would do it Jeopardy style, but I'm too lazy. But really, Davis has let his own brothers and sisters in the media skew his view of Cam. Of course he'll bother to learn new footwork. Not saying it'll work, but dude ain't gonna just sit there. Then again, Smitty and Jarrett and a playbook come to mind.

There's plenty of talented NCAA players who flame out in the pros due to lack of desire to put in the work. It's in no way a given that he'll be willing to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charles Davis is talking NFL Draft on WFNZ this afternoon. His soon to be released mock has us taking Cam Newton. He feels that Newton throws a better ball than Teabag or Young. The question that the Panthers need to answer is will he take the time to watch film and learn the footwork. He also noted that Bradford didn't take the ball under center either, so that should not be a deterrent. If he loves football and will take the time, then he'll learn that quickly enough. He also noted that he'd take Luck over Newton, if he were there.

Well first of all he is full of poo. Bradford did just fine under center. It is funny how clowns make up poo to drag bradford back to the pack in regards to these QB's this year when he was clearly better than any of them coming out.

Next, 'Teabag'? Really? you mean the guy that newton couldn't beat out at Florida? He did more than Cam ever did in College and did it for 3 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...