Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So... The deep balls


PleaseCutStewart
 Share

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Interesting how you keep posting these ridiculous comments.  He absolutely threw deep with great accuracy at Bama.  You don’t know what you are talking about as usual 

Bama. Schmama. 
Why didn’t he just seamlessly transition to making those same throws in the NFL?  
I guess you will blame that on everything but your boy. As usual. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

/year three

No no the deep passes are coming, I swear, honestly, just give it more time

You sound like one of my patients in the ED for the fourth time this year telling me their abusive husband just needs more time and is ready to change 

I didn't say he would, lol. I said if he could.

Look back at the end of last year - Same deal.

He shows up every few games and executes. Need consistency at QB and he hasn't been it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

/year three

No no the deep passes are coming, I swear, honestly, just give it more time

You sound like one of my patients in the ED for the fourth time this year telling me their abusive husband just needs more time and is ready to change 

I don't really think he nor the DC offense is going to be a consistent 20+ yard targeting offense. We just don't run that kind of offense. In fact, Bryce has never really been in an offense that strayed too far from basic West Coast principles in his NFL career.

So, the lack of deep targets can't really be placed completely on his shoulders. It's easy to individually blame him for missing reads deep, which he has over and over. But, I would wager that if you really broke down those "missed reads" in detail that the deep target misses wouldn't stand out statistically. Just a hunch, I have no details on that at all.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

If he grows a foot and learns to make a second read he could be a starting caliber qb

He definitely went thru his progressions yesterday and it did pay off. Of course he still had his misses... But a great game overall.

Doesn't mean I want to hang onto him for what he's shown do far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

Do you think a check down is considered a read by nfl coaches 

That depends on the factors involved. Quite a few of the shorter passes that we do throw the "check down" is one of the first 1-2 reads. One could argue that could be because of Bryce but that's really almost impossible for us to know without Dave Canales essentially telling us that directly. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't really think he nor the DC offense is going to be a consistent 20+ yard targeting offense. We just don't run that kind of offense. In fact, Bryce has never really been in an offense that strayed too far from basic West Coast principles in his NFL career.

So, the lack of deep targets can't really be placed completely on his shoulders. It's easy to individually blame him for missing reads deep, which he has over and over. But, I would wager that if you really broke down those "missed reads" in detail that the deep target misses wouldn't stand out statistically. Just a hunch, I have no details on that at all.

I don't think deep in the fan sense matters much, honestly. I still think he needs to be able to consistently place passes well up to 20 yards and that's what is more critical. He did that yesterday - he was basically 7/11 on passes 15-25 yards and that's good enough that it also opens up passes all over the rest of the field. In week 10 he was 1/2 in that range; week 9 2/3 with an int; week 7 he was 0/4. 

Anyway we need more of that... He needs to be stressing defenses past the sticks for us to open up the rest of the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

That depends on the factors involved. Quite a few of the shorter passes that we do throw the "check down" is one of the first 1-2 reads. One could argue that could be because of Bryce but that's really almost impossible for us to know without Dave Canales essentially telling us that directly. 

This is true. And there are def times where that rb out of the backfield is the primary read even, way more with Chuba.

that was not the case at all yesterday. Bryce was going PA one read, someone leaked out of the backfield, got to the flat, stood there, waved, looked at the mlb who was busy playing Pokémon go, then caught a pass.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

Coryell and Walsh didn’t.

if you don’t know, they’re generally considered the architects of modern nfl offenses. They’ve written books. You can read them. Theyre not hard to find.

I haven’t read Gus malzahn’s book. 

Bryce definitely has taken too many of them in his time at QB but there are times it's a good decision.

I don't really see the point in harping about check downs yesterday though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...