Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looking ahead


ProcessBlue2
 Share

Recommended Posts

I tend to think most clearly after games like this, I think because my expectations are grounded.

VS Rams- Loss (Probably won’t be pretty OR it’ll be a weird game where it’s a lot closer than it should be)

@ Saints- Win (We will probably not get swept, and there will be some hope for the division because the Bucs will be dragging)

VS Bucs- Win (Bucs won’t be focused, we win at home in last minute style per usual)

VS Seahawks- Loss (Complete blowout, not focused, like Buffalo, NE, etc)

@ Bucs- Loss (Eliminated from playoffs prior, guys have checked out, injuries, etc)

Finish 8-9 

Edited by ProcessBlue2
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Or Bucs finish 7-10 and still win Division because NFL says fug it, we ain’t putting them in the playoffs

A team winning the division at 7-10 while an NFC North or NFC West team doesn't make it to the playoffs at 10-7 has to happen for no other reason than it would be objectively hilarious.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jopie87 said:

A team winning the division at 7-10 while an NFC North or NFC West team doesn't make it to the playoffs at 10-7 has to happen for no other reason than it would be objectively hilarious.

No I meant us finishing 8-9 and the Bucs finishing 7-10 and the nfl telling us to to fug ourselves lol

But yes I agree. 

Edited by ProcessBlue2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waldo said:

I think the Saints win another one. Especially after a Rams beat down. 

Not sure on the Bucs with them being a divisional game and the health of Baker. 

Saints losing to the Falcons killed their momentum. We definitely could lose to them again though. But I think we even it out at 1-1. It’ll probably be 10x closer than it has to be. And one against the Bucs because how the NFCS is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Saints losing to the Falcons killed their momentum. We definitely could lose to them again though. But I think we even it out at 1-1. It’ll probably be 10x closer than it has to be. And one against the Bucs because how the NFCS is

The Saints aren't a good team but they play us hard and know exactly how the Panthers work while being built well agaisnt them. I'm not buying a Panthers win in those circumstances. It's the anti-Falcons type game. 

I'm not sure on the Bucs. They are also built to win agaisnt this Panthers team. Even without Baker I wouldn't count on a split yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, HPPanther said:

Do the Bucs hold the tiebreaker over us?  What would that be?

These would be the three tie breakers, in order. So the head to head is the biggest and the schedule makers thought 2 of the last 3 against the same team would be fun.

Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).

Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.

Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

I tend to think most clearly after games like this, I think because my expectations are grounded.

VS Rams- Loss (Probably won’t be pretty OR it’ll be a weird game where it’s a lot closer than it should be)

@ Saints- Win (We will probably not get swept, and there will be some hope for the division because the Bucs will be dragging)

VS Bucs- Win (Bucs won’t be focused, we win at home in last minute style per usual)

VS Seahawks- Loss (Complete blowout, not focused, like Buffalo, NE, etc)

@ Bucs- Loss (Eliminated from playoffs prior, guys have checked out, injuries, etc)

Finish 8-9 

I do not see it

too many injuries …on the oline and defense 

Plus the saints have always given the panthers fits 

And mayfield can manage that non throwing shoulder injury, they are tge division champs 

6 and 11

last night was a dagger stuck into many things 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hard to interpret some of Brugler's opinions. Capable of running a robust route tree sounds like a lazy thing to say - I'm sure just about every slot TE is capable of running a full route tree... I want to know if he is currently able to (which from tape leads me to a no). Granted, it's pretty common for most receivers/TE not having a full route tree developed before they get drafted. Agility/acceleration after the catch hasn't shown up on his tape (at least his Oregon tape) for those dig/out breaking routes while it has for the seam and slant routes. Agree he has a good physical build and he is very good running seam routes. His build definitely helps him to shield defenders and create a large target point for the QB. Drops were a concern, but it could be focus drops just like T-Mac was/is prone to. Run blocking is an accurate statement, but again, we have only seen him run block in the slot/backfield - inline blocking is a whole different animal. With his athleticism, he definitely has a high ceiling. I just think he also has a low floor and don't like taking that big of a risk on a mid 1st rounder. I think this is a deep TE draft and would much rather target one in the 3rd or later. He's very boom or bust to me - bust in terms of being worth a 1st round pick, not an out of the NFL in a few years type bust. I feel like he gives me Evan Engram vibes. Not saying that Evan Engram was/is a bad NFL player, just that most people would agree he shouldn't have been drafted in the 1st.
    • I mean I would love 6-1. It’s funny the hurricanes usually dominate the first game and win by three or four goals. But keep the second game close. It would be nice if it’s the reverse of that tonight.
    • Brugler has him as TE1 and going to the Ravens in the first.  Apparently Sadiq's football IQ is pretty high (interviewed very well).  Also he was an WR and CB in high school.  This is why I always thought his route running was solid.  I'm sure it needs some polishing but for a TE it's pretty good. nfl.com Built like a bodyguard with a compact, well-defined frame. Capable of running a robust route tree. Gets in and out of breaks with good snap and separation. Vandalizes defensive seams with impunity against man coverage. Survives collisions with catches thanks to his hand strength. Shows off agility and acceleration after the catch. Fits up run blocks with proper positioning and base width. Grips and presses forward with moving feet to stay connected. -Again I don't know if we should take him but if he goes to the right team he could become a scary weapon at the next level.  I just like him as a prospect.
×
×
  • Create New...