Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moehrig only a fine? or a game?


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, strato said:

I guess not. Do we have enough guys to play? 

Thornton out, horn out. It will be mike Jack Smith Wade and whoever else off practice squad. Ransom will come in at safety. Stafford may throw for 350 in the first half unless their defense strip sacks Bryce 5 times on the 30 which may happen as well 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Horn out, and Thornton…we may have a guy not currently rostered lining up opposite Davante Adams lol. And w/Jackson on Puka. 

Get ready for it folks, it’s gonna be a slaughter.

We will win by a FG and then get blown out by New Orleans probably. Cause this season is weird as poo 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, apparently, Jennings is back in the news after today’s game lol

Browns DT Shelby Harris says #49ers WR Jauan Jennings was talking dirty while Maliek Collins was getting carted off today.

"He's a hoe. I see why he got punched in the nuts. ... I'm surprised no one punched him in the jaw 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From The browns today.  Jennings is a cuck

 

I see why he got punched in the nuts," Shelby Harris said after the game, a 26-8 win for the 49ers. "He says some things that you should not say to another man ever. But I don't respect it because you say that, then run behind your O-line. That's some real soft s---, and I want that known

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...