Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

21 game sample size


Car123
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Steves89 said:

Idk… skipping out on fumbles and completion percentage doesn’t look great. I think the better argument in favor of Bryce is that he has improved in yards, yards per attempt, completion percentage, and touchdowns each year, year over year.  That’s pretty promising…except where he started was so dismal. And every third game he flashes that year 1 quality. Honestly I think we’ll keep him. 

Bryce is averaging less yards in 2025 than in 2024 as a starting QB.  ypa attempt is virtually identical, as it's so close next Sunday can swing it under(as he has been under his average in most games this season). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CRA said:

Bryce is averaging less yards in 2025 than in 2024 as a starting QB.  ypa attempt is virtually identical, as it's so close next Sunday can swing it under(as he has been under his average in most games this season). 

Bryce  is not averaging less yards than 2024. He is averaging more.  In 2025, he is averaging 194.8 yards per game. In 2024, it was was 171.6. That looks like more to me but maybe I’m missing something.  The point is that they both are pretty bad and whether the improvement gives us any hope that he will one day not be pretty bad

Edited by Steves89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Wouldn’t surprise me at all. I still don’t think he’ll ever get us to the show, but we might be stuck with a large contract. The 5th year tier 1 QB option is already over $40M.

I’m worried we won’t ever try to draft a QB with a high pick and get elite level physical talent. I do like the 2026 QB draft because there have been a lot of underachieving QBs that were highly touted. Good draft to get a potential great value.

I’m going to enjoy the ride we’ve had so far this year but I don’t like the idea of extending knowing we are basically doing what Arizona did with Murray knowing he’s just OK and not going to lead you to the SB.

So the 5th year option minimum is 40 Mill, what is the average amongst NFL teams expense on a QB, like relatively speaking. I’ve not ever really looked into the money and just accepted it’s reality tv LOL.

 

but I still love the game and hold out hope it’s real. 

Edited by Diehardpanth02
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Steves89 said:

Bryce  is not averaging less yards than 2024. He is averaging more.  In 2025, he is averaging 194.8 yards per game. In 2024, it was was 171.6. That looks like more to me but maybe I’m missing something.  The point is that they both are pretty bad and whether the improvement gives us any hope that he will one day not be pretty bad

you are missing the word as a starter.   as a starter, he is averaging less in 2025 than in 2024.  It's a technicality as he averaged 195.75 as a starter in 2024.   But less is less.  Those 2 garbage time appearances when Dalton got pulled late skews his 2024 per game number down. 

But if you are looking for non-technicalities, he is averaging basically the exact same yards per game as starter and ypa the last 2 seasons as a starter as the difference is splitting hairs.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Diehardpanth02 said:

So the 5th year option minimum is 40 Mill, what is the average amongst NFL teams expense on a QB, like relatively speaking. I’ve not ever really looked into the money and just accepted it’s reality tv LOL.

 

but I still love the game and hold out hope it’s real. 

his 5th year is 27 million, I believe its tied to his draft year and not current market. 

Im not going to even think about it right in the race, off-season will have 100s of thread talking about it and whether to pick up or pass......Im no fan BY, *but a panther fan....... I do not know what to do, just Id hate to tie my job status to BY......100% bring in some legit comp, this is the NFL f BYs feelings....

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...