Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why does Bryce get the blame?


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Canales is currently under contract through 2029.

If Bryce has a bad year next year I'd bet dollars to donuts that the following year sees Dan and Dave being allowed to pick the guy they want to replace him. 

Zero logic to cleaning house just over Bryce, especially when you consider that neither of them were in charge when he was taken.

history says there is zero chance David Tepper lets a losing HC have a shot to do it "his way" starting year 4.  Heck, not even Tepper.  You can go league wide with that.  Coaches aren't afforded that sort of time line in today's NFL. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, mrBdawg said:

Who is laughing at Lamar, Mahomes, Rodger’s not running the sneak themselves? They just have a tight end do it.

Why the fug is that not an option for this team if Bryce can’t do it? It’s is such a tired narrative that it negatively affects the team and is some huge flaw.

We could even do a tush push with Bryce and have him find a tiny gap. Then Tremble can shove him through it. Boom, now we’ve turned his size into an unstoppable weapon. Tush Push 2.0

Lamar slightly built a made of glass aging duel threat (yea hes 28 but that's old for his play style). Mahomes suffered a busted kneecap in 2019 on a sneak.  Rodgers ran them all the time until is late 30s.....  not the same as not believing the guy has the strength to make it successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You would be absolutely insane to think that.   If 2026 mirrors or is worse they are done.   That is just how it works

Not really. Frankly, there is no one "way it works" in the NFL...

And for whatever I may think of Tepper, I don't believe he's quite dumb enough to put blame on two guys who at the moment are doing decent jobs (especially Morgan this year) for not succeeding with a guy that it was his insistence we take. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

history says there is zero chance David Tepper lets a losing HC have a shot to do it "his way" starting year 4.  Heck, not even Tepper.  You can go league wide with that.  Coaches aren't afforded that sort of time line in today's NFL. 

he is a fool to think that if it goes sideways next year, after picking up the 5th, that tepper will let dan and dave paint bryce as a scapegoat and let them bring in "their" guy in year 4.  No fuging owner is letting that happen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

history says there is zero chance David Tepper lets a losing HC have a shot to do it "his way" starting year 4.  Heck, not even Tepper.  You can go league wide with that.  Coaches aren't afforded that sort of time line in today's NFL. 

You're referring to the guy who not long ago got stung by the criticism of how many different coaches he'd been through in a short cycle?

The same guy who also not much more than a week ago went on record saying he really loved what he saw Dan Morgan and Dave Canales building here?

That David Tepper?

Okay, sure 😕

Lemme guess: Is David Tepper sitting right next to you in the room again?

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not really. Frankly, there is no one "way it works" in the NFL...

And for whatever I may think of Tepper, I don't believe he's quite dumb enough to put blame on two guys who at the moment are doing decent jobs (especially Morgan this year) for not succeeding with a guy that it was his insistence we take. 

Yes, yes there is absolutely a way it works.  How often do you ever see a coach and gm get multiple chances at picking the qb?  If it happens its damn rare.

And the jury is still out on Morgan.  poo draft last year, 2025 is trending down so yeah I suspect after next year we will have a pretty good resume to judge dan and dave. 

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Can’t throw 25 yards? lol he just threw a bomb to Evans on Thursday, you do know it’s not his throwing shoulder.

🤣🤣🤣 im well aware of that you do know the motion required to generate a throw like that is extremely painfull on the opposite shoulder too right?  Also it was the longest pass he threw all night at 27 air yards.... hardly a "bomb"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

You're referring to the guy who not long ago got stung by the criticism of how many different coaches he'd been through in a short cycle?

The same guy who also not much more than a week ago went on record saying he really loved what he saw Dan Morgan and Dave Canales building here?

That David Tepper?

Okay, sure 😕

Lemme guess: Is David Tepper sitting right next to you in the room again?

Yes I am sure he is loving having one of the worst offenses and worst performing qbs in the nfl.  Especially after being told DC was some offensive dude that could "fix" bryce.  I am sure he is estatic about that fact

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Doubt he'll ever be elite, but as I've mentioned previously it is fair to point out that he's improved over the past two seasons and could further improve next year also.

I'm still not confident in him at this point but none of us can guarantee that won't happen. 

It took awhile but as Bryce progresses he’s essentially becoming exactly what they expected when they drafted him

Bryce was never supposed to be Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen or Joe Burrow. Bryce Young was pegged as a point guard type QB that can give you a handful of special plays/throws a game.

The ones that are crying about the trade still are the ones that never understood what exactly Bryce is/was.  You can disagree with trading up for a QB like Bryce but you can’t hate Bryce for that.

Bryce bailed out the coaching staff and OL enough times on Sunday. He did his part. He extended multiple plays and some big time anticipation throws. There’s at least 4-5 really good plays from Sundays game where Bryce was damn good. Canales is the one who says we just need a few special plays from our QB per game

The FO and even Tepper knew what they were drafting when they took Bryce. Hell, Tepper called him a point guard himself the night of draft. It’s on the FO to surround him/a QB like him with the proper pieces to be successful. Which they have not.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

There's enough data to make an educated case

I think he has improved..... very very slightly year to year at this rate with his limitations he will finally cap out as Brock Purdy in 2036

16 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Doubt he'll ever be elite, but as I've mentioned previously it is fair to point out that he's improved over the past two seasons and could further improve next year also.

I'm still not confident in him at this point but none of us can guarantee that won't happen. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

It took awhile but as Bryce progresses he’s essentially becoming exactly what they expected when they drafted him

Bryce was never supposed to be Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen or Joe Burrow. Bryce Young was pegged as a point guard type QB that can give you a handful of special plays/throws a game.

The ones that are crying about the trade still are the ones that never understood what exactly Bryce is/was.  You can disagree with trading up for a QB like Bryce but you can’t hate Bryce for that.

Bryce bailed out the coaching staff and OL enough times on Sunday. He did his part. He extended multiple plays and some big time anticipation throws. There’s at least 4-5 really good plays from Sundays game where Bryce was damn good. Canales is the one who says we just need a few special plays from our QB per game

The FO and even Tepper knew what they were drafting when they took Bryce. Hell, Tepper called him a point guard himself the night of draft. It’s on the FO to surround him/a QB like him with the proper pieces to be successful. Which they have not.

theres copium and then there is whatever this is

 

Godalmighty

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You would be absolutely insane to think that.   If 2026 mirrors or is worse they are done.   That is just how it works

Bryce is so bad I'm praying they sign Howell and give him a shot in Canales modified run/spread/PA air Coryell....  Brycey cant consistently hit the deeper plays to make it effective.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...