Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING NEWS: Per Jeremy Fowler, Panthers expected to pickup Bryce Young's 5 year option


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

We need a new #1, #2 and #3 in Carolina.  

all picking up Bryce’s 5th does is delays us from addressing the QB room.  Which is the most important room to address 

Did you ignore the part where I said draft a guy? We aren’t getting one of the top 3 this year, he’s going to need to sit a bit. Unless you want to trade picks for a Mac Jones type which would be dumb with where we are 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

thats the point, in 90% of the cases a decision is made one way or another.  Running this back for 2 more years hoping he can get to top 15ish by the end of year 4 is crazy.  Because again after year 4 you have to make another decision while on the hook for 27 million.  It doesnt make a lick of sense

Right. So picking up the option is essentially a prelude to a big money extension. The concept of 1st rounders having that extra option year was to give teams the financial control over a prospect, with the assumption that the team was planning on keeping them and signing them to an extension off their rookie deal.

Teams are free to do a Jags-deal if the idea is that it might be more sensible economically to get the player wrapped up long-term earlier after the 3rd year, and subverting market forces that may cause values to go up. So it is a gamble if you think you are buying in on a player low and getting a deal that you may not secure 2 years down the road in many ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Pick it up and his trade value goes up, especially if he makes a run into the playoffs.

There's enough mystery there as to has the coaching been holding him back or has it been his physical portion.

There's going to be a coach or GM out there that's going to look at Baker Mayfield and Sam Darnold, look at the Panthers organization, and think Bryce might be worth a flyer if there's a two year inexpensive tryout period. 

Maybe the Vikings, Dolphins or even Pittsburgh. Might even be a hail Mary attempt from Phoenix.

And maybe we do it and stick with him after a really strong showing in the playoffs, if we get there. 

The biggest problem is that Bryce has had some pretty good performances, just enough to make a front office wonder, but we've also had some really dud coaching games, too. So is Bryce the problem or is it our coaching and game planning. 

Hell, we don't even know, so other teams probably are looking at it and seeing that while the odds aren't good, there's a heck of a payoff if they are right.

 

No offense but picking it up basically makes his trade value tank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Lamar is the only recent 1st round QB to play all 5 years of his 5th. The others were either cut or extended before the 5th year and those contracts were all massive. Bryce getting 55m a year would be insane. 

he had already won a mvp and was in negotiations with the team the entire time.  A bit different.  Danny dimes would be a closer comp but he just played on his 4rth and the team stupidly gave him a massive deal.  You are who you are by year 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Did you ignore the part where I said draft a guy? We aren’t getting one of the top 3 this year, he’s going to need to sit a bit. Unless you want to trade picks for a Mac Jones type which would be dumb with where we are 

thats the point, they arent drafting a guy if they pick up the 5th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

We need to flush the QB room in the offseason.

IMO, if we add no FA nor legit draft options(not a UDFA) to this QB room in the offseason, 100% of all information about Tepper, Morgan and Canales will be clear.

That "braintrust" will have conclusively proven they have zero idea what the fug they are doing.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UnluckyforSome said:

Right. So picking up the option is essentially a prelude to a big money extension. The concept of 1st rounders having that extra option year was to give teams the financial control over a prospect, with the assumption that the team was planning on keeping them and signing them to an extension off their rookie deal.

Teams are free to do a Jags-deal if the idea is that it might be more sensible economically to get the player wrapped up long-term earlier after the 3rd year, and subverting market forces that may cause values to go up. So it is a gamble if you think you are buying in on a player low and getting a deal that you may not secure 2 years down the road in many ways.

the 5th works in the extension as its still cheaper then "market value"

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

So many people have no idea how this poo works and it’s so goddamn frustrating. 

are you agreeing with me or is that aimed at me lol

I could see either way as there are not a lot of examples of teams simply picking up the 5th to buy time to see if said player improves in year 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Correct. Draft your future guy to sit behind Bryce and get rid of Dalton and bring in a traits guy as a backup

Draft a guy to develop and bring in a veteran starter who can at least make every throw the NFL requires a QB to be able to make from the pocket.

We're currently drastically limiting Canales' playbook to accommodate Young. 

Trade Young or sit him as QB 3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...