Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan open to bringing in younger QB to develop/compete for backup role


 Share

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Most of those guys should be available in the 5th to UDFA range too. We have a chance to finally bring in a good #3 developmental guy or potentially a #2 upgrade.

Funny thing is, they are all better than BY now....

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

I dont think he has the right attitude to make it in the NFL.   The NFL is tough and almost every time he has faced adversity,  including this year, he has looked bad.

His body language in that last game was that of a pouty little kid until it felt like everything around him got him into position to have an easy run in TD and he seemed surprised himself lol. I think that was his ceiling in his football career. Don't want him. I'd take Chambliss but he's possibly played himself into QB2 in this draft. Simpson in the 5th I'd maybe do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I'd take Chambliss but he's possibly played himself into QB2 in this draft. Simpson in the 5th I'd maybe do

As in the second qb taken in the draft? No way. Plus his lawyers will file suit against the NCAA this week in Mississippi.  My prediction is that the NCAA will cave.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rebelrouser said:

As in the second qb taken in the draft? No way. Plus his lawyers will file suit against the NCAA this week in Mississippi.  My prediction is that the NCAA will cave.  

Who is your second QB in this draft?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

Funny thing is, they are all better than BY now....

That is definitely not true. It could be true with a few of them but this is also the thing people said about Anthony Richardson or Dillon Gabriel or Shadeur Sanders or JJ McCarthy or....

You get the point. Bryce is very bad, in fact he is basically a backup QB. But there are worse QB's and more than we sometimes think.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I'd like to get Allar if he drops past round 3.  Seems to have all the physical ability and I'm not sure Penn St has the best group around him aside from TW two years ago.  

Hopefully(for us) he isn't healthy enough to work out much. That will keep his draft position suppressed enough to get it down to Day 3.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

His body language in that last game was that of a pouty little kid until it felt like everything around him got him into position to have an easy run in TD and he seemed surprised himself lol. I think that was his ceiling in his football career. Don't want him. I'd take Chambliss but he's possibly played himself into QB2 in this draft. Simpson in the 5th I'd maybe do

Chambliss??? Bro....he will be lucky to be a 4th rounder. 

I don't think you are reading this situation correctly at all. He is basically Malik Willis-esque minus the elite arm. Raw, athletic and needs a ton of polish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I will judge how serious that statement is by the quality of backup he brings in.

100%.

Jack Plummer, Hendon Hooker and Mike White are not serious options in any way, shape nor form.

It should be someone that can immediately supplant Dalton as #2.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Chambliss??? Bro....he will be lucky to be a 4th rounder. 

I don't think you are reading this situation correctly at all. He is basically Malik Willis-esque minus the elite arm. Raw, athletic and needs a ton of polish.

Chambliss in every thing I've seen and read is next up behind Mendoza and Moore (if he declares). I'm not talking rounds, talking next qb picked 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

100%.

Jack Plummer, Hendon Hooker and Mike White are not serious options in any way, shape nor form.

It should be someone that can immediately supplant Dalton as #2.

Its all talk right now. Actions speak louder than words. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

Chambliss in every thing I've seen and read is next up behind Mendoza and Moore (if he declares). I'm not talking rounds, talking next qb picked 

The early draft articles are gonna be pretty sketchy. All that material gets better as real NFL scouts and FO folks start talking to journalists and draftniks. Also everyone will start locking into "draft mode" and doing serious deep dives as opposed to less surface level quick looks.

This is projected to be a very weak overall QB class so it is possible some of those Day 3 guys make their way to Day 2 but I don't personally anticipate that happening to a lot of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The good thing about replacing a bad player is you really have nothing to lose. If their replacement is bad so what, you didn't get much worse and probably saved money.  
    • I came over from the old Panthers Insider site. When Fox Sports bought that platform it slowly just started dying plus the guy who ran that site was dealing with some pretty significant health issues so the whole thing just slowly fell apart. Quite a few of us migrated over here. Not sure how many are still around.  I miss that place. It struck a nice balance of having enough active posters to keep productive conversation flowing but didn't have so much traffic that you end up with a lot of trolling BS. This place is getting there though since we shutdown new registrations but at some point we're going to have to open it back up or we'll watch this place slowly die off too as posters fall off for one reason or another. We just have to figure out a way to filter out the spam bots. It was a never ending battle to ban the spam bots to keep then from overrunning the site. You'd think they'd be a little more strategic. I mean, if you fill a site with nothing but spam people are just going to stop coming so it's not a sustainable model. But nope, every one of them makes dozens of duplicate threads filling up pages upon pages as soon as their account goes live.
    • lol...I don't remember that.  Although recalling what I had for breakfast yesterday is sometimes a challenge.  Hope it was a positive thing.
×
×
  • Create New...