Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Canalas bring someone else in to call offensive plays?


Recommended Posts

I don’t see how it is supposed to work when Canales has his mini me as OC by title, but is de facto OC. How do you inject a play caller from the outside into that situation? 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, strato said:

I don’t see how it is supposed to work when Canales has his mini me as OC by title, but is de facto OC. How do you inject a play caller from the outside into that situation? 

It would work by bringing in someone competent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It would work by bringing in someone competent.

Not what I was looking for there.  You, I believe, would advocate forcing the issue and getting Canales out if possible. 
 

I am looking at if I am Canales oholding a 6 year contract with 4 years left and just won the division and almost an upset in the playoffs, and has that stadium rocking…

And you want me to give up my autonomy and likely demote or terminate my right hand guy… I would likely dig in my heels. You would have to push it hard. Too hard. You will have big time upset Apple cart.  
 

For me, I can’t see how Idzik is any better at it. We looked at that in preseason and IIRC people were bitching. 
 

But someone bitches about every single thing that is done or not done so who knows….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, strato said:

Not what I was looking for there.  You, I believe, would advocate forcing the issue and getting Canales out if possible. 
 

I am looking at if I am Canales oholding a 6 year contract with 4 years left and just won the division and almost an upset in the playoffs, and has that stadium rocking…

And you want me to give up my autonomy and likely demote or terminate my right hand guy… I would likely dig in my heels. You would have to push it hard. Too hard. You will have big time upset Apple cart.  
 

For me, I can’t see how Idzik is any better at it. We looked at that in preseason and IIRC people were bitching. 
 

But someone bitches about every single thing that is done or not done so who knows….

Well Canales is already a bottom 3 OC and bottom 5 HC. How much worse is it possible to get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Well Canales is already a bottom 3 OC and bottom 5 HC. How much worse is it possible to get?

Well that just wasn’t the question that I asked. The bottom this and that has been discussed and will be discussed again. 

It is a very similar situation to Bryce. Both their jobs are safe right now as far as I can tell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is how I see it...You can talk to the QB until 15 seconds before the play clock expires.  There are reasons to believe that Canales is spending a lot of time gathering information from those in better position to make the decisions.  Have you noticed how often we break the huddle between 15 and 13 seconds remaining?  I have a theory...

1. Canales is on the sideline.  His view of the field is not as good as the OC, who is sitting in the box in the sky--he can see the defense, spacing, substitutions, etc.  This means that Canales must get information from up top before selecting a play.

2. Canales has to spend time during the week with the defense, special teams, etc. in addition to the offense.  The OC is with the offense all week.  He knows the plays that were run well in practice--he knows the nicks and dings they might be complaining about--he knows their questions and input about certain plays, formations, etc.  Canales may be aware, but not AS aware. 

3.  Canales likes the moniker "QB whisperer."  He may feel more confident being the voice in Bryce's helmet because he is Bryce's mentor. 

Just a theory--but Canales could be the play caller because Bryce is the QB and he is trying to literally whisper into the QB ear.

Edited by MHS831
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Here is how I see it...You can talk to the QB until 15 seconds before the play clock expires.  There are reasons to believe that Canales is spending a lot of time gathering information from those in better position to make the decisions.  Have you noticed how often we break the huddle between 15 and 13 seconds remaining?  I have a theory...

1. Canales is on the sideline.  His view of the field is not as good as the OC, who is sitting in the box in the sky--he can see the defense, spacing, substitutions, etc.  This means that Canales must get information from up top before selecting a play.

2. Canales has to spend time during the week with the defense, special teams, etc. in addition to the offense.  The OC is with the offense all week.  He knows the plays that were run well in practice--he knows the nicks and dings they might be complaining about--he knows their questions and input about certain plays, formations, etc.  Canales may be aware, but not AS aware. 

3.  Canales likes the moniker "QB whisperer."  He may feel more confident being the voice in Bryce's helmet because he is Bryce's mentor. 

Just a theory--but Canales could be the play caller because Bryce is the QB and he is trying to literally whisper into the QB ear.

You one of those guys that watched The Sopranos for the Tony and Dr Melli scenes? Pretty deep psychological motivations there. 
 

That headset cutoff, that came up in a discussion about pre snap. The claim was the defense waits until Canales is muted to show their hand, leaving Bryce with dirty underwear a lot of times. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strato said:

Well that just wasn’t the question that I asked. The bottom this and that has been discussed and will be discussed again. 

It is a very similar situation to Bryce. Both their jobs are safe right now as far as I can tell. 

I did answer your initial question with my intial answer.

Also, you are aware this already happened? He didn't have any say in getting Evero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I did answer your initial question with my intial answer.

Also, you are aware this already happened? He didn't have any say in getting Evero.

We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it. 
This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment.
I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now. 

Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement. 
Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work. 
Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not. 
 

Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out. 
And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO. 
 

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

My translator says something quite a bit different.

I think Canales stays as OC and it ends up getting him fired after the 2026 season.

The whole thing is setting itself up that way.  Run it back and the law of averages says about 4-5 wins.  I think at a minimum Tepper would force Canales to hire a rock star OC.  But he’d probably just fire everyone.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

The whole thing is setting itself up that way.  Run it back and the law of averages says about 4-5 wins.  I think at a minimum Tepper would force Canales to hire a rock star OC.  But he’d probably just fire everyone.

I watched the Morgan presser just now. The Evero extension was to align the contract with Canales’.  Whatever that really means. Morgan sort of made a point of putting it that way.  
 

You could infer a fair amount from that move.
For one, it lines up with the thing you guys are saying. Total reboot. Contracts are aligned. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have no evidence that Canales is a forward thinker who is willing to make uncomfortable decisions for the betterment of the team. He seems very non confrontational, those types of people won’t make changes unless forced to. Dan Morgan is the same mold as Canales. Which means if changes are made, it’ll only come from one man. That man is David Tepper. But it most likely won’t be until next season. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...