Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Having signed Phillips, will they now target a OT for first pick?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

If you look at this class OT figures to be the best value at #19.

Its also where the top DT's are protected to start coming off the board. I'm thinking it's OT or DT at 19 with OT being a slight favorite. I'm going to be tuning into who the official visits this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Its also where the top DT's are protected to start coming off the board. I'm thinking it's OT or DT at 19 with OT being a slight favorite. I'm going to be tuning into who the official visits this year.

I wouldn't hate Peter Woods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chknwing said:

I think Carolina is setting up for Kenyon Sadiq.  He gives the offense a great weapom

If he made it to 19, I think this would be a no brainer. 

Though depending on FA, I think OT is definitely in the mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WUnderhill said:

It always seemed the way this draft was going to shake out that there would be better options of OT at 19 than edge rushers or LBs.

It will be unless there is a run on tackles. They may not have a good one left by their 2nd pick. I think if they want one it will have to be at 19 because I think they will be picked out by the time pick 51 rolls around. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I wouldn't hate Peter Woods.

Peter woods has fallen out of DJs top 50 ranking, that's a big deal....even the Panthers 2nd is in question now. Just a big fall and bad combine deal.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

It will be unless there is a run on tackles. They may not have a good one left by their 2nd pick. I think if they want one it will have to be at 19 because I think they will be picked out by the time pick 51 rolls around. 

Yeah I think there is almost no choice, as long as there is a guy there with a first round grade you gotta take an OT.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see no way we draft BPA when we have no LT--if we sign Nijman, maybe--but we cant go 17 games with him.  I see no options.  Freeling, Proctor, Lomu.  For some reason, I see us taking Proctor if Freeling is gone. I'd rather have Lomu.  

In this post, I have mentioned the name of our first round pick.  

Unless some weird shite happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...