Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is Your Dream 1st Round Today?


tukafan21
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

If it's not Miller it will be the other guy they brought in that's a pure RT. 

Gross

If we go OT in the 1st, it NEEDS to be someone who can play LT.

Taking a pure RT means they only see the field if Moton gets hurt, and I can never get behind taking a player in the 1st round that you legitimately hope doesn't see a single snap all season long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

It's not about the teams behind us taking a QB, but it would come down to how much the Cardinals like him and if they're afraid of someone else trading into say 22-24 range to take him.  

SOMEONE will trade into 30-32 to take him at the worst, so I think if a team like the Cardinals or Jets fell in love with him during the pre-draft process, they'd be looking to trade into the early 20's to get him.  If both teams think the other have the same plans, 19 is a great place for them to jump up to so they can grab him.

I put it at like 1% chance of happening, but that's why I said it's my dream scenario.

As if Bryce shows he's not the guy, we have two 1sts next year to fix QB.  And if he shocks me and shows he can be the long term guy, it gives us 2 firsts to put some hopefully day 1 impact players out there for a legit SB push.

There's only 2 teams left that are in serious need of a young qb right now. That's the Jets and the Cardinals. I'm not sure they want to part with what it would take to trade with us. One of the bottom 5 teams will trade with them if it happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

It's between Proctor and Lomu at #19 if we go tackle.  Why draft a RT?  It makes no sense, Moton isn't the problem and he's under contract the longest our OTs even though that's only two years.

They surely would take either of those if they are there. Everything depends on when the LT run starts. Depending on who you ask there's only 3, maybe 4 of them in the 1st round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

There's only 2 teams left that are in serious need of a young qb right now. That's the Jets and the Cardinals. I'm not sure they want to part with what it would take to trade with us. One of the bottom 5 teams will trade with them if it happens. 

I think the Rams are a very real possibility to see trade into the back end of the 1st to take him.

All reports are that they really like him, and Stafford doesn't have all too much longer left in him, if they like him as much as the rumors, I can see them giving up their 1st next year to get back in and take him to sit and learn from Stafford for a year or two before taking over.

But all it takes is 2 teams and it can create a trade bidding war to make sure you get back into the 1st before the other does.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Gross

If we go OT in the 1st, it NEEDS to be someone who can play LT.

Taking a pure RT means they only see the field if Moton gets hurt, and I can never get behind taking a player in the 1st round that you legitimately hope doesn't see a single snap all season long.

They've met with or worked out 2 pure RT and both have be projected as 1st round talent at one point or another. They've also met with 2 projected LT's who will supposedly go before out pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Only one answer allowed, so not a list of players or multiple options.  So if you could just pick one thing to happen and it plays out, what would it be?

Mine is a team who wants a QB in the 1st gives us an early 2nd and a 2027 1st to move up to 19 to take a QB (maybe Cardinals?)

This is my choice as well. The Cardinals, Jets--neither wants to go home empty-handed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I think the Rams are a very real possibility to see trade into the back end of the 1st to take him.

All reports are that they really like him, and Stafford doesn't have all too much longer left in him, if they like him as much as the rumors, I can see them giving up their 1st next year to get back in and take him to sit and learn from Stafford for a year or two before taking over.

But all it takes is 2 teams and it can create a trade bidding war to make sure you get back into the 1st before the other does.

I think the Rams will get Stafford's replacement next year. Better class overall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Can't keep pining for what never happened....but for god sakes, DeJean, Frazier... and we got this dude in a R1 trade up.  The most notable blunder of this era, that's for sure. 
    • Overall, fine.  Wish we landed a guy to pair with Lloyd but I presume this means they're giving Trevin one final year to put it together (72nd overall 2 years back).  Flashed potential year 1, had a dud last year.   R1: Freeling LT - Great value and a need; landed our new long term LT that could end up starting off the bat.  Icky had a terrible injury and is not playing in his contract year.  Walker is what he is on a 1-year rental, who even knows how he fits. You get premier OTs early if you can find em' and he has what you want.  I thought he could have gone as high as 6/CLE pre-draft, so am a big fan of the selection.  Looking at this class, he's one of the guys at the top that is like "okay that's the LT".  Others have this right/left or G/T type discussion about them.  Freeling is an LT.   R2: Hunter NT - We didn't really have anyone replacing A'Shawn's snaps in our rotation.  Wharton & Brown aren't 3 downers so adding Hunter to the mix fills a big void. I dug deep into S and LB this draft so was a bit to zeroed in - In recognize the value and impact add in the trenches. R3: Brazzell WR - Intriguing.  Given our history, I don't really want to place any expectations here, but a different style weapon for Bryce. I pretty much expect a WR drafted yearly with this regime. Other notables.. Hecht C - These are the type of rounds where starting centers have been found.  We got a starter for this year, but Hecht seems pretty capable and I like it for a long term find.  SOLID AF.  Wheatley S - A pretty well regarded safety prospect.  And we see it every year (like this one) safeties get hyped, people think they may go sooner than expected, and the league reminds them how it rolls.  Plenty of nice safeties have been found in the 4th-6th in recent years.  Big fan of Wheatley. Can't say I know enough about Lee or the others. 
×
×
  • Create New...