Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carson Palmer = Yes Please


Zod

Recommended Posts

Saying he's a significant upgrade over anything we have isn't saying much, LOL

All things being equal, I'd much rather get McNabb... there's clearly something wrong with Palmer's arm.

I am not sold on McNabb outside of Andy Reid's WCO....he looked like total garbarge in Washington.

However, I would be ok with McNabb....but I would prefer Carson. He has been successful in a similar offense to what we are likely to run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never been a fan of Carson Palmer. I thought he was overrated and still do, but it'd be foolish not to pursue him or McNabb this off-season. I trust Donovan's arm more, but I would prefer the player be a combination of teacher and winner. If they can't be bothered to big brother jimmy or the rest of the team for that matter, turn em away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At what price. If it is going to take two #1 draft picks than no.

I would love to have him but is he good enough to give the farm away is my only thing!

I would not give up ANYTHING close to a first round pick for him.

Given the fact that he has told Cinn that he will retire before he plays next season for them, his value is much, much lower.

If he sticks to that stance, the Bengals could either watch him retire and get nothing. Or, they could get something (lower pick or switching picks) for him and send him to an NFC team.

Even the Bengals are not stupid enough to let him retire.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Our holes last year were the passing game, injuries on the offensive line and poor play at the tackle. Get a QB, get Otah healthy, and get a couple of new DT's, and we could be good this coming season.

and the most important piece, intelligent offensive-minded coach/QB coach/and Rivera who can dissect the opposing defense as he talked about helping our offense..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McNabb was 26-49 for 357 yards against the Packers last year... you know, the guys that won the SB.

But his passer rating was 75 and he threw for 1 TD and I Int.

The general debate around here has suggested that a decent QB should post a passer rating above 80. Last year out of 13 starts he posted 3 games with a rating over 80. He posted twice that many with ratings in the 60s or below.

By comparison Palmer had 7 games with ratings over 80 and 6 games with rating in the 60s or below.

Honestly neither guy really send me screaming their praises although if Shula could do for them what he did for Garrard it might be worth a risk if they were cheap.

I still don't know if either has the arm for a vertical downfield passingattack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But his passer rating was 75 and he threw for 1 TD and I Int.

The general debate around here has suggested that a decent QB should post a passer rating above 80. Last year out of 13 starts he posted 3 games with a rating over 80. He posted twice that many with ratings in the 60s or below.

By comparison Palmer had 7 games with ratings over 80 and 6 games with rating in the 60s or below.

Honestly neither guy really send me screaming their praises although if Shula could do for them what he did for Garrard it might be worth a risk if they were cheap.

I still don't know if either has the arm for a vertical downfield passingattack.

Still, not many people hung 357 yards on the Packers this past season...

You should also factor in that Palmer was playing in the same system he's played in for years with a decent o-line and at least one good receiver whom he's very comfortable with while McNabb was playing in a totally new system, with nobody worth a damn at WR whom he has any familiarity with behind what may be the worst o-line in the NFL.

I'm not saying McNabb is going to put us on his back and carry us to the SB, but at this point I think he's a better bet than Palmer simply because Palmer seems to have something seriously wrong with his arm and I'm not willing to forget about 11 years of success for McNabb (granted, in a WCO) vs. one year of failure with the Skins (who could make any QB look bad).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ya and he also got benched for Rex Grossman

Salt my friend, that whole situation is BS. Bottom line Shanahans kid sucks ass as an OC and when McNabb tried to do something about it, Shanahan made him the scape goat.

Honestly if they would take our 4th I have no issues with mcNabb. The guy still has 3-4 good seasons in him which allows us to move down, grab more defense, maybe get a 2nd rounder to grab a QB and develop OR take one in the first next year and develop them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zod, if palmer was still the qb he once was, i'd be dooling all over the chance to get him as a panther qb.

Fact is, he's barely a shell of the qb he once was.

You want a broken qb, go for it...beat that drum. It won't make him back into the qb he once was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take either Palmer or McNabb to mentor Cam/Clausen they're the best vet options out there. I wouldn't be expecting much the move would strictly be for a veteran presence behind center and take our young QB's under there wing.

I'd take McNabb over Palmer though look how he helped Vick...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to be clear: I'm not "downplaying" the talent around Bryce... I'm qualifying it. There's a big difference between saying, "we finally have building blocks that we're actually developing" and "we've done enough to say this is a finished product, NO EXCUSES!" It's possible to believe that the 2023 situation was bad and to believe that the current state, while improved, is still incomplete. That's not inconsistency; that's nuance. As for the footwork stuff, again, I've seen the same clips as others. The claim that Bryce is hopping to see over the line just isn't one I've seen corroborated by analysts or tape breakdown. "Both feet off of the ground to throw" happens a ton for QBs (ex: Mahomes, Rodgers, Purdy, etc.), especially when improvising. You're right that there were some encouraging flashes from Bryce last season, and it's nice to finally hear that after so much time was spent pretending otherwise. I'm not arguing that Bryce is elite, I'm just asking that we evaluate him using consistent, measurable criteria to determine his status as a top-10 QB... whether it's via 3rd down %, red zone efficiency, turnover-worthy plays, or yes, big-time throws (which, by the way, has been a valid part of QB evaluation across the league for years even if it wasn't used here during Kyle Allen or Teddy Bridgewater's years. For reference: Allen had 20 BTT at a 3.9% rate. Teddy had 17 BTT at 3.3%). Like you, I'm hoping to see a competent, entertaining offense this season. That's a baseline we can all root for, even if we don't have the same baseline for what makes a QB top-10 (which, to be fair, is what this conversation has been about... though I respect the attempt to reframe it).
    • I am optimistic that we might be on the verge of fielding a sustainable offense finally. The Bryce stats listed above are definitely encouraging. I don’t want to overly inflate this and disregard the previous 1 and a half seasons of production from Bryce and “cherry pick” stats but do hope the benching turns into an inflection point in his trajectory.      Lots of excitement heading into this season. 
    • Summary The 2024 Carolina defense posted a 44.9 grade last year, which was the worst in the NFL since 2020. They also had the worst receiving grade in the NFL despite a QB that emerged in the second half of last year. TMac is most likely WR1 in this class and is now WR1 in Carolina He's going to be incredibly helpful on go balls, dig routes, and in the redzone. Highlights show just that: First highlight is Arizona vs. Utah. 4 verts vs. cover-0, TMac lined up alone on a go ball vs. press = we're launching it Second highlight shows his potential as the X. Runs a backside in-cut and the Tampa-2 MLB sells out on the corner route, leaving his back to TMac. Tough over the middle, explosive after the play. Sees TMac doing a lot of what Mike Evans was asked to do in Tampa. Third highlight shows how effective TMac is in the redzone and it's his one-handed catch vs. Travis Hunter. Brings "indefensible plays." Has size advantage that can beat guys, can jump, and has ridiculous hands. Will help Bryce in year 3 as it will allow him to continue playing "fearless" like he did after coming back from benching. Highlights show where TMac fits and re-emphasizes how he's going to make things easier on go balls, dig routes, and in the redzone: Fourth highlight shows Bryce vs. ATL when he hit AT vs. AJ Terrell down the sideline. Bryce has to hold the single deep safety during his drop to give Thielen a chance (who is only 4yds off of the LOS when Bryce is throwing it). Registers the big-time throw attacking vertically. Fifth highlight is vs. KC on a blitz where Bolton is coming downhill while Karlaftis is dropping back over the middle. Has an in-route that has outside leverage with Chris Jones applying immediate pressure. Layered it over Karlaftis' head for the completion. Sixth highlight is the fade route TD to David Moore vs. Zona. in the redzone. David Moore was the X on this play. Thought this was interesting, especially considering recent conversations about Bryce's intermediate game needing to be better:
×
×
  • Create New...