Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Zod's OFFICIAL first overall pick selection is....


Zod

Recommended Posts

Patrick Peterson

Peterson is the closest thing to a sure thing future pro bowler in this draft. He would step in day one as a starter and improve this team a great deal on both defense and special teams as a returner. Patrick Peterson on Roddy White twice a year? Yes please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our defense is about 3 or 4 players away from being a Rivera-type, #1 in NFL defense. Make it great now with lower risk players. Peterson at CB means they will throw more to Gamble, the guy they avoided last year. Then draft a DT at 65. Nevis, Austin, Wilkerson--I think one drops to us. Add a free agent DT. Set to go. 2 draft picks. Do not underestimate the impact of a stellar defense on offensive playcalling and risk taking.

With the other draft picks, build some depth at OL, DE, and possibly WR.

The offense needs to mature. They are young. A veteran leader is needed here for a while. Be patient and we will find a franchise QB soon. Heck, you would have to be patient with Cam anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love PP but he doesn't do anything to fix our QB problems.

That is based on the assumption that the QB problems have to be addressed in the draft, in the first round. I understand your frustration. And maybe they like Cam or Blaine, but the D needs some studs too. There are great WRs and QBs in our conference who must be stopped. Ideally, trade down.

My Board after trading down about 4-8 spots and accumulating picks:

Peterson

Quinn

Dareus

Bowers

Fairley

Newton

Gabbert

Green

I would not trade lower than Tennessee at #8. At least one falls. That is the benefit of having multiple needs. Considering Von Miller is going top 6 probably, you would likely get your choice between two of these players. By dropping to #7 or #8, you would get a second rounder and probably a third rounder minimally for a player you might have chosen first overall anyway. More picks, lower salary Win Win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If anybody has listened to Canales's pressers, you can tell he is talking out of his ass. Being handicapped by Bryce isn't an excuse, he was quick to bench Bryce last year and if he doesn't believe in Bryce this year then bench him again. It's his decision making that we can judge as a HC, not necessarily how the players play. He was giving Evero so much flack for not playing the young guys on defense when they were clearly outperforming the vets. But he refused to play Rico more than Chubba? If anyone listened to his presser yesterday, he literally said that he gave Chubba more carries because of "what he means to this organization." Canales has a buddy/good guy system, he will give guys that HE likes more opportunity instead of the guy that actually performs. How do you explain David Moore making the roster and starting over other guys.   
    • It's useful as others said for solutions, upvotes are arguably ideal for a solution/answer forum. For opinions, not so much.  I also just hold a grudge against reddit for killing off forums 
    • I actually don’t blame them for drafting an XL type WR over mcconkey. They were looking for an X WR. Not a slot. Not saying I love the pick. Just that i kinda understand why they went in that direction. Now i think they thought they were drafting a plug and play WR which is not what they drafted. XL is a player you have to scheme open consistently. They don’t seem to be consistently doing that. 
×
×
  • Create New...