Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

latest on the CBA


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

Rookie wage scale is agreed upon

18 games is now OFF the table according to the NFLPA because...

owners released some financial information but not enough to make anyone happy.

Smith included a list of 10 financial categories, including total operating income and total operating expenses. NFL lead negotiator Jeff Pash said the league has offered an unprecedented amount of financial data. The union has said it's not sufficient.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/giants/2011/03/10/2011-03-10_justin_tuck_remains_optimistic_but_nfl_owners_players_now_battling_over_financia.html#ixzz1GDktYkws

So basically the same things you can get off Forbes website?

Here is the nugget i had not heard before...

If the union decertifies and the league locks the players out, one prominent agent told the Daily News Wednesday he will send all his clients to work Monday at the team facilities and predicts others will do the same. He said once the union decertifies and if the league can't stop it by proving it's a sham, as it maintains, then he said the players can't be denied the right to work.

"Every guy shows up for work and says, 'I honor my contract. If you don't want to honor my contract, then I'm free," the agent said. "If they turn them away, I'm going to state court to let you know my contract is null and void and I'm a free agent and you owe me damages, treble damages because you are locking me out and it's a restraint of trade because there is no union."

That's why this agent says, "I don't think the owners will lock out."

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/giants/2011/03/10/2011-03-10_justin_tuck_remains_optimistic_but_nfl_owners_players_now_battling_over_financia.html#ixzz1GDkZcM23

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the union decertifies and the league locks the players out, one prominent agent told the Daily News Wednesday he will send all his clients to work Monday at the team facilities and predicts others will do the same. He said once the union decertifies and if the league can't stop it by proving it's a sham, as it maintains, then he said the players can't be denied the right to work.

"Every guy shows up for work and says, 'I honor my contract. If you don't want to honor my contract, then I'm free," the agent said. "If they turn them away, I'm going to state court to let you know my contract is null and void and I'm a free agent and you owe me damages, treble damages because you are locking me out and it's a restraint of trade because there is no union."

That's why this agent says, "I don't think the owners will lock out."

Damn, that's some good Lawyering!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always laugh when I hear the players complain about 18 games. If they're so concerned about injuries why not just demand playing 14 games? Because they won't make as much money. The league and the players will make more money from 18 games so it'll get done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i actually like it how its set up now .. because then you have the 2 extra games in preseason to get a really good look at your rookies / 2nd year guys .. with just 2 games we could be fielding teams with no chemistry right and left .. with an 18 game schedule training camp would have to be extended among other things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If the union decertifies and the league locks the players out, one prominent agent told the Daily News Wednesday he will send all his clients to work Monday at the team facilities and predicts others will do the same."

That's like sending a teacher to work in July... nobody is there. The players' work schedule does not have them going to work in March and the NFL has established work schedules (camps, OTAs, etc.). It's like me showing up to work on Sunday when the place is closed and demanding they pay me just because I showed up. Argument: FAIL

"He said once the union decertifies and if the league can't stop it by proving it's a sham, as it maintains, then he said the players can't be denied the right to work."

That is a huge "if." If the union were to put itself back together any time within about a year, the NFL and the owners would be filing suit about how much of a sham it was and the union could then be held legally liable for violating labor laws itself.

"Every guy shows up for work and says, 'I honor my contract. If you don't want to honor my contract, then I'm free," the agent said. "If they turn them away, I'm going to state court to let you know my contract is null and void and I'm a free agent and you owe me damages, treble damages because you are locking me out and it's a restraint of trade because there is no union."

These are the same players who are worried they cannot pay for their own health insurance correct? These are the same guys who are borrowing money from each other? These are the same guys we've read articles about possibly looking for a job but they've got the resources to hire an attorney to go against the NFL and the owners? Watch one player try that stunt and see how long he plays football in the NFL. He'd be blacklisted so fast Maurice Clarett would be laughing. I'll believe that when I see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.
    • I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there: There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders. The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young. Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November. Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall. The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them. So if we're framing things with that context: Chuba was expected to be RB1 Miles (at the time) was RB2 Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway. The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).   NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.
    • Yep, but they can all rotate with Brown, Brown and Robinson (sounds like a law firm). Can't continue to have Derrick Brown out there for 90+ percent of the defensive snaps. An injury was bound to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...