Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can't These Other Computer Manufacturers Step Up?


fitty76

Recommended Posts

I could pick up at least two android tablets for the price of an ipad. It all breaks down to what you are going to use the tablet you buy to do. There are cheaper tablets that don't have all of the multimedia features, and tablets like the zoom that have more features than the ipad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Apple/PC debate will rage on forever... I'm in the middle. All these products have their place. If I was a teacher/nurse/lab worker, etc., someone who walked around all day for work, a tablet would be great and much easier than a laptop... I sit at a desk 90% of the day, so a laptop/desktop functions best for me... So it's less about the manufacturer and more about the equipment.

If Apple made a product that was cost effective and made my job easier, I would buy it, even though I've always been a PC guy... but so far, for what I do, PCs are far more cost effective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apple has some pretty displays. If anything, it's where they excel at. I would SO get an Apple display over my current monitor. If you say.. compare the iPhone display screen to any of the competitors, it's gonna have WAY more pixels and be a much higher quality build. Screens are where other companies try to save money on.

Apple is legit. They have renewed their rep and have been successful. For the record, I only own a 3rd gen iPod. No other apple products.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As soon as they make an iPad that works with a Stylus pen, I will buy one. I need a tablet that I can draw on because I really need to move from pencil and ink to digital media, but I don't want the bulk or the price of tablet laptop or a PC tablet with a monitor built in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apple has some pretty displays. If anything, it's where they excel at. I would SO get an Apple display over my current monitor. If you say.. compare the iPhone display screen to any of the competitors, it's gonna have WAY more pixels and be a much higher quality build. Screens are where other companies try to save money on.

Apple is legit. They have renewed their rep and have been successful. For the record, I only own a 3rd gen iPod. No other apple products.

Yeah. 3000 bucks for a monitor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...