Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Two Kicker Conundrum


The_Cannon

Recommended Posts

Haven't seen this talked about but I was just reading an Darin Gantt article over at the observer that said there is a proposed rule change, that now kick offs will be done at the 35 and not the 30 and touchbacks will be at the 25 instead of the 20. Now I don't really understand the reason for the change IMO it won't prevent injuries or anything else so it's kind of pointless.

But if they do change the rule, do you think we might scrap the idea of having a kick off specialist and just let Kasay do all kick offs. I never thought Kasays leg was THAT bad and with the shortened distance I'm sure he'd be able to handle it and it would free up a roster spot for us to use.

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/2011/03/would-rule-change-make-lloyd-obsolete.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No offense to any of the kickers, but I honestly hope the Panthers do away with the kick off specialist role. Seriously, would they have been any worse with out one last year? Did Rhys’s touch backs win them any more games? Also, how many game jerseys’ did one of our young players miss because of having a K.O. Specialist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand why they did it (saving Kasay for scoring opportunities) and objectively, it probably helped just as much as a young guy who'd likely only play special teams anyway.

Still, there will come a time when we have only one kicker, and the departure of John Fox may hasten that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't seen this talked about but I was just reading an Darin Gantt article over at the observer that said there is a proposed rule change, that now kick offs will be done at the 35 and not the 30 and touchbacks will be at the 25 instead of the 20. Now I don't really understand the reason for the change IMO it won't prevent injuries or anything else so it's kind of pointless.

But if they do change the rule, do you think we might scrap the idea of having a kick off specialist and just let Kasay do all kick offs. I never thought Kasays leg was THAT bad and with the shortened distance I'm sure he'd be able to handle it and it would free up a roster spot for us to use.

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/2011/03/would-rule-change-make-lloyd-obsolete.html

it prevents injury b/c it will greatly reduce the number of returned kicks. More balls in and out of the endzone....and if you opt to return one you gotta at least make it 5 more yards than before to make it worth it.

new era is here regardless. Bye bye Kasay. Hopefully, Kasay walks away and is ready to retire though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand why they did it (saving Kasay for scoring opportunities) and objectively, it probably helped just as much as a young guy who'd likely only play special teams anyway.

Still, there will come a time when we have only one kicker, and the departure of John Fox may hasten that time.

Yeah, it's a sad moment. But it might be time to completely move on and Kasay is the last limb of the tree to be cut off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kicker has always been an interesting position. They can be the most insignificant player on a team the entire season but become the most important in an instant. Definitely a better to have and not need than need and not have position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it got passed it would also reduce the need for a kickoff return man as well given they will largely be catching them and downing the ball.

As for getting rid of Kasay, why would you do that at this point. He is money inside 50 yards. If you want to replace someone how about finding a punter who can kickoff as well. That would be easier than replacing Kasay I would think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it prevents injury b/c it will greatly reduce the number of returned kicks. More balls in and out of the endzone....and if you opt to return one you gotta at least make it 5 more yards than before to make it worth it.

new era is here regardless. Bye bye Kasay. Hopefully, Kasay walks away and is ready to retire though.

The silliness of it all is that they made rule changes a few years ago for the specific purpose of reducing the number of touchbacks in order to make the game more exciting.

Now we're trying to take it in the opposite direction, and all because everybody's scared that someone might get hurt playing football :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...