Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Meril Hoge on Blaine Gabbert


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

Well it is apparent to me anyway that Rivera and Hurney chose the 3 QBs with the most upside to study intently in case one of them falls far enough to want to move up and snag him. I'm thinking that if Ryan Mallett is still there around pick 20 or so, Hurney will pull the trigger and go get him. I don't think they want to draft one 1st overall, but they would like to get one further along round one or two if one of these guys is there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the draft doesn't suck. the quarterbacks do. the draft is fine.

A number of the best prospects are one year wonders (Fairley, Bowers, Newton), and the consensus top players (Green, Peterson, and Dareus) don't play premium positions. Nobody knows where in the hell this Gabbert talk came from. To be more fair, this draft kind of sucks at the top. The depth is fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the top of the draft is actually very strong when you look at from positions like cornerback, defensive tackle, defensive end, and wide receiver.

The problem is that the media wants to suck off quarterbacks, runningbacks, and linebackers. Because they are building up guys like Gabbert and Newton who don't look particularly safe, they make the top of the draft look thin. They downplay every other position because it isn't "flashy".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the top of the draft is actually very strong when you look at from positions like cornerback, defensive tackle, defensive end, and wide receiver.

The problem is that the media wants to suck off quarterbacks, runningbacks, and linebackers. Because they are building up guys like Gabbert and Newton who don't look particularly safe, they make the top of the draft look thin. They downplay every other position because it isn't "flashy".

That's not fair. Everybody hates runningbacks in the nfl draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the top of the draft is actually very strong when you look at from positions like cornerback, defensive tackle, defensive end, and wide receiver.

I think this is a pretty accurate description of the draft. For our purposes, I would say we can find a good DT--as good at DT as the top QBs are at QB--in the second and possibly into the third round. DE is very solid, but not so much the 4-3 DEs from what I can tell. CB has quality through the third round.

By the way, these estimates are based on projections I have been watching--who really knows where they will be drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...