Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers draft strategy may be very different...


MHS831

Recommended Posts

...than many on this board realize. In fairness, we don't have a lot of inside info--even the reporters are in the dark with this staff.

Many are assuming we are going QB because that is the focus of the media. The Panthers do not mind hyping the QBs because it is their best chance to trade . The big picture, however, does not suggest that QB is our biggest need.

Here are some points:

1. Have the Panthers and Steve Smith agreed on a trade after the CBA is done? All indicators suggest it is a real possibility--I think a liklihood based on the actions and comments over the last few months. The latest rumor is that the Panthers are considering AJ Green. The only reason we would do that is if SS was as good as gone. DT? They are deep in the draft.

2. Are the Panthers more interested in continuing to develop their young talent at QB, having drafted 2 last year, and considering a veteran? Hurney, the guy who calls the shots at the draft, still thinks there is something in Clausen. He wants to see what another year will do for him, probably in a backup role. Is drafting a 3rd/4th QB in two drafts the answer? Might he wait to see if Kaepernick or Dalton fall to the #65? There are a lot of directions we can go besides drafting a QB who will not be ready to start.

3. Doesn't the fact that we have a list of 5-7 names a month before the draft send a signal to other teams in the top ten that we would be interested in a trade? To me, if you cannot decide on players 60% into the process, then the player on the bottom of the list of 7 and bonus picks would be more valuable than your pick of the litter.

It just seems to me that our prioorities could be much different. If we do not like either QB at #1, then it makes sense to beef up the WR corps and OL around the QBs you bring in via FA or continue to develop. You see the supply and demand and realize teams want QB and might give you a deal to drop, so you make it look like you covet a QB. The press sees the attention and we read the press.

IF SS is indeed as good as gone and they do not have a ton of confidence in Lafell and Gettis as anything more than complimentary WRs, they COULD try to drop, get a second rounder, and draft AJ Green or Jones. Then in the second, they could get a DT or--Ponder, Dalton, Mallett, or Kaepernick. In the third round, assuming they draft a QB in the second (maybe they won't--who knows) but they could get a DT and CB in the third.

They could even trade up if necessary. Maybe this is a reach, but maybe assuming it will be QB doesn't consider some huge variables.

At any rate, the speculation is making this the most interesting draft I can recall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The coach and gm have pretty much voiced that QB is THE need

that doesn't meant they will draft it #1 overall but they have identified that as THE weakness. So you gotta assume they will address it by some means

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My take is that the Panthers wants Steve Smith on it. Richardson and Smith are close and he is the ultimate decision maker. It really is whether Smith wants to stay. And that will totally hinge on who we bring in at quarterback. If we stay pat with what we have Smith is history. If we bring in Gabbert or newton and secure a vet, then he is likely to stay.

We will not draft Peterson. We don't need another stupid corner on the team, Gamble is enough.

There is no quarterback below the first round who is better than pickles so if we don't go Qb in the first we will likely pass until at least the 4th round when we might find someone better than Pike who is likely gone.

Teams will trade up with the partner who gives them the best deal. If we agree to trade down we won't be getting their first and second and next year's first. That is pure fantasy. If we hold that tough, they will just wait to see what we do and try to negotiate with other teams who will ask less. Honestly without a rookie wage cap or CBA done, I think there is going to be a lot less trading up or down than people think.

if we stay at number 1 we will pick up a Qb or DT in the draft. That seems pretty clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont really trust hurney in the second round. I think Kalil may be his best pick there. He does better after the 4th round than any GM I can think of.

Actually, the Kalil pick came from the Jets when we traded down and let them take Revis @15 and we got Beason @25. Our initial 2nd round pick was Jarrett.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you consistently write so much and say so little

[i

One day, you will read something called a BOOK. Then you will realize that my posts are not long. Maybe you can then read it to your illiterate friends, you troll. I will give you the cliff noted version: The ham is green.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you consistently write so much and say so little

It seems every time I post you feel the need to make some punk-ass comment. Why is that? Do long posts threaten you? Why can't you just ignore it if you can't read it?

Maybe you could ask Santa for Hooked on Phonics this year and not Madden 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How about just don't draft project players in the first round? How about especially when you have arguably the worst roster in the NFL(we did all those years in question)? You don't even have to dig into those player debates specifically. Just don't grasp at straws early in the draft.
    • I think there were 9, and since I haven't took time to watch each of them on each play individually Its impossible for me to say, which I doubt you have either.   It's not a stat driven grading system; it's a per play grading system.  Tommy Tremble making a great block to spring Rico for that 10-yard run might actually score higher on that play then Ricos run. The actual run might not be anything special; it might be a run that pretty much every back in the league would have made. Here again, I would guess, if you look at every RB in the league, he is towards the top in rushing grade for the year which is what most of us are seeing.  Whether you call that a 90/80/70, 50/40/30, A/B/C, Gold/Green/Red star, it doesn't really matter it's how he ranks relative to everybody else at his position.      
    • Well I will never knock a strong arm, in a vacuum, but it is a lot more than that to it.  Did we kill our roster building and our defense in particular to stick PJ out there?  No. We knew we sucked and he was really just a temporary thing too.  While with Bryce I see the up and down, mostly down, roller coaster on loop now in year three. It has been a Looooong time.    Back to strong arms, it is like having a powerful motor in a car. All the power in the world isn’t going to overcome a bad driver.   But at the same time, even a decent drive with a killer car will beat the best driver if you put him in a go kart   Exaggerating for effect, I know Bryce is not a go kart. Maybe closer to a 6 cylinder with not much displacement….. 
×
×
  • Create New...