Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In Depth Look at Gabbert's pro day


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

http://www.profootballweekly.com/2011/03/22/gabb-session

I'm not posting it because i'm a blaine nuthugger, I'm posting it because it seemed interesting to me. in the second part of the article, the author details just about every throw he made, and how precisely he made them, and the rhythm he got into. I thought it was cool to get an in depth look at what actually went down at his pro day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like Gabbert and I feel like he could really surprise people if given a chance and if he ends up in the right place.

that being said, we're not going to take him. I don't get the feeling that we are going QB. Maybe it's because *I* feel we shouldn't that I think the team feels the same way. Dunno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, he's got the hair for it, I guess.

I think a lot of quarterbacks in this draft have potential. People keep saying it's weak but you have 7-8 QB's w/potential. Gabbert, :D, Locker, Mallet, Ponder, Stanzi, Kaepernick, Taylor, kid from Alabama. That doesn't look too bad if you ask me. Perfect time to grab the one that we feel is best. Next year we only know of 3-4 possible good QB's. We don't know what the hell is gonna happen with free agency. We dont have that bad of a team. Depending on how the QB play is, we might be picking in the middle of the round 7-9 or 8-8 as usual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sucks if you have to take a QB #1 overall based mostly on potential. It'd be nice if any of these guys looked like they were worth a damn today and could step in and play. Maybe he turns out alright, maybe he doesn't, who knows.

I guess potential means you can't step in and play nowadays. I think you misunderstood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...