Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mallett on Sports Science


Swarly

Recommended Posts

He will be a really good QB if the rumors around him are false.

Considering the rumors have been around for months and there has been virtually zero sources backing it up, I'm assuming it's false until proven otherwise. I personally think he will be the best QB in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the rumors have been around for months and there has been virtually zero sources backing it up, I'm assuming it's false until proven otherwise. I personally think he will be the best QB in the draft.

Months?? Try years. I have no idea whether it is true or not. And not having a source that has talked to the media doesn't mean things are not known by NFL teams.

Not saying he did anything. As a matter of fact on my totally worthless QB board I have him second in front of Gabbert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take Mallet over Gabbert. I think he can be a franchise QB if he goes to the right team.

if we absolutely had to take a QB this draft I'd take Mallett over any of them. don't want a QB at all though unless Mallett somehow falls to the 3rd round(won't happen). damn shame we don't have that 2nd round pick..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Months?? Try years. I have no idea whether it is true or not. And not having a source that has talked to the media doesn't mean things are not known by NFL teams.

Not saying he did anything. As a matter of fact on my totally worthless QB board I have him second in front of Gabbert.

^This

There has been zero corroboration of the rumors, but where there is smoke there is fire. (usually) If it is not true, it is a really sad situation, because he would be a serious consideration for #1 if the rumors were not out there.

Mellett is by far the best passer in the draft, but is not even considered a top 15 pick because of either; a habit that will preclude him from any success in the NFL, or the most coordinated character assassination in recent memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take Mallet over Gabbert. I think he can be a franchise QB if he goes to the right team.

you would seriously have Mallett behind our line??? wow, if that's the case, i hope Otah stays healthy all year, Mallett is SO slow

would be just as concerned with how he handles pressure etc as any off field concerns.

i am more worried about pressure on the field with Mallett, that speed scares me, i fear that he will be sacked alot, other than that, he's another Cutler.

He will be a really good QB if the rumors around him are false.

i think he will be a really good QB if he's protected and his speed either improves or isnt as bad as i think it is. Mallett has the best deep arm in this draft. Sorry Newton, Gabbert and Locker, but i think Mallett's deep arm is best. Mallett has the deep arm, Gabbert is more accurate, Newton has the most potential with his size, mobility and arm and Locker in my book is the best runner and i would trust him to run an offense too. i think Locker should be picked at pick 10 by Washington, that's where i think he could fulfill his potential because Shanahan did a good job with Cutler and Plummer and those two are who Locker kinda remind me of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...