Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mallett on Sports Science


Swarly

Recommended Posts

He will be a really good QB if the rumors around him are false.

Considering the rumors have been around for months and there has been virtually zero sources backing it up, I'm assuming it's false until proven otherwise. I personally think he will be the best QB in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the rumors have been around for months and there has been virtually zero sources backing it up, I'm assuming it's false until proven otherwise. I personally think he will be the best QB in the draft.

Months?? Try years. I have no idea whether it is true or not. And not having a source that has talked to the media doesn't mean things are not known by NFL teams.

Not saying he did anything. As a matter of fact on my totally worthless QB board I have him second in front of Gabbert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take Mallet over Gabbert. I think he can be a franchise QB if he goes to the right team.

if we absolutely had to take a QB this draft I'd take Mallett over any of them. don't want a QB at all though unless Mallett somehow falls to the 3rd round(won't happen). damn shame we don't have that 2nd round pick..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Months?? Try years. I have no idea whether it is true or not. And not having a source that has talked to the media doesn't mean things are not known by NFL teams.

Not saying he did anything. As a matter of fact on my totally worthless QB board I have him second in front of Gabbert.

^This

There has been zero corroboration of the rumors, but where there is smoke there is fire. (usually) If it is not true, it is a really sad situation, because he would be a serious consideration for #1 if the rumors were not out there.

Mellett is by far the best passer in the draft, but is not even considered a top 15 pick because of either; a habit that will preclude him from any success in the NFL, or the most coordinated character assassination in recent memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take Mallet over Gabbert. I think he can be a franchise QB if he goes to the right team.

you would seriously have Mallett behind our line??? wow, if that's the case, i hope Otah stays healthy all year, Mallett is SO slow

would be just as concerned with how he handles pressure etc as any off field concerns.

i am more worried about pressure on the field with Mallett, that speed scares me, i fear that he will be sacked alot, other than that, he's another Cutler.

He will be a really good QB if the rumors around him are false.

i think he will be a really good QB if he's protected and his speed either improves or isnt as bad as i think it is. Mallett has the best deep arm in this draft. Sorry Newton, Gabbert and Locker, but i think Mallett's deep arm is best. Mallett has the deep arm, Gabbert is more accurate, Newton has the most potential with his size, mobility and arm and Locker in my book is the best runner and i would trust him to run an offense too. i think Locker should be picked at pick 10 by Washington, that's where i think he could fulfill his potential because Shanahan did a good job with Cutler and Plummer and those two are who Locker kinda remind me of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...