Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nelson imposing forced mediation


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

The owners didn't want forced mediation by the courts because the mediator will have power to make decisions and the owners don't want to be told what to do.

What does this mean? It means it will be forcefully resolved to BOTH sides disgust very soon. The mediator will listen to both sides and if they are refusing to budge the mediator will make a decision for them and that's that. Its been done before and this judge isn't going to screw around apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The owners didn't want forced mediation by the courts because the mediator will have power to make decisions and the owners don't want to be told what to do.

What does this mean? It means it will be forcefully resolved to BOTH sides disgust very soon. The mediator will listen to both sides and if they are refusing to budge the mediator will make a decision for them and that's that. Its been done before and this judge isn't going to screw around apparently.

Thanks for the explanation..:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what does this mean?

verb (used without object)

1. to engage in thought or contemplation; reflect.

2. to engage in transcendental meditation, devout religious contemplation, or quiescent spiritual introspection.

–verb (used with object)

3. to consider as something to be done or effected; intend; purpose: to meditate revenge.

;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What do you suggest we make threads on? We have the worst record in the NFL since Tepper bought the team and this staff and a majority of these players will be gone next season.
    • Too much is made about the trade that never was. At that time Burns was the ONLY legit pass rusher we had on the team. If you had got rid of him you who was going to supply the pass rush? I think at that time he was viewed as cornerstone of the team going forward. Even now he's still only 27. And, we still have not added a pass rusher to replace him. I would have made more sense to try get get them to take Derrick Brown. Burns has more sacks in a season than Brown has had in 5 seasons. Those picks would have been in different years so we would have only had one extra pick in each year. And, let's be honest. You see how this team has drafted over the years. We used #1 picks in Bryce Young and XL. Do you really think those picks would have made a difference on this team? 
    • Been done. Very limited upside. Most of his positives are based in nostalgia.  It was always going to be a rough ride for whoever signed up for it considering the situation. 
×
×
  • Create New...