Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The best strategy for the #1 pick.


SmootsDaddy89

Recommended Posts

Don't use it. Just sit back, let other teams run up and make their picks first. Hell, it'll make the draft go faster too. Then around 12-15 make a pick.

Sure, we could trade down and get our second back, but who wants to do that given the history of our 2nd round picks?

The safest draft pick is one that is not made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't use it. Just sit back, let other teams run up and make their picks first. Hell, it'll make the draft go faster too. Then around 12-15 make a pick.

Sure, we could trade down and get our second back, but who wants to do that given the history of our 2nd round picks?

The safest draft pick is one that is not made.

This is by far the stupidest most idiodic idea I have ever heard. Most people who think of things like this realize how retarded it sounds and place it back in the far depths of the brain where it belongs. You on the other hand, document your retardation on the internet for the world to see... Congratulations, you made it official.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is so ignorant, I think I just lost an IQ point or two reading it,LOL

This is by far the stupidest most idiodic idea I have ever heard. Most people who think of things like this realize how retarded it sounds and place it back in the far depths of the brain where it belongs. You on the other hand, document your retardation on the internet for the world to see... Congratulations, you made it official.

the only people who are ignorant, stupid, or retarded are the ones who can't tell when another poster is joking. You need a better sense of humor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, am I wrong? I looked back over all his posts here and I didn't see anything positive other than Shough. Second, pretty sure if you had read the post I was responding to, you would have seen CRA made poo personal as well . You just choose to address me instead of him. Not sure why?????
    • I wanted XL but I felt he should have been a 2nd rounder but I understand the logic trading up just to get the option. A safety net for your gamble.    Certainly disappointed with his receivers development but i like his down field blocking and I imagine that's what's keeping him on the field. 
    • Pretty sure it is a given Young lacks typical QB size and strength and he is here simply because his other attributes more than make up for it. My point is not to indicate anyone "settled" for him but rather to remind people that there have been plenty of big, strong QB's that have not lived up to expectations. Jamis Winston, Anthony Richardson, Trey Lance, JaMarcus Russel are a few examples. They all have the physical attributes coveted by teams and yet none have had sustained success in the NFL. And yes, there are QBs that do have both but there aren't many and some of the ones still playing were failures with their early teams. Saying Young is a bust simply based upon his size (and I do think it is as simple as that for a few guys around here) is unfair to both him and the team.
×
×
  • Create New...