Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rick Gosselin's Big Board


Murph

Recommended Posts

let's hope we don't lose here. I would rather not have to think, "well at least it only took us three years to recover from that bust." (this is true of any player we pick that busts, not just Cam)

Me too. Conversely I would also hate to say "We are still last in the NFC South but at least that guy wasn't a bust.

Basically see my avatar :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and I will be we still take Cam anyway. =|

If we draft Cam we still have to address the QB position for 2011 and potentially 2012 - this is why we shouldn't take him. If our front office is content with being bad again this year why not just tank again and get Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gosselin has Cam ranked as the 6th best player in the draft and the top QB, I can live with that.

I was going to say the same thing. I honestly am not too familiar with this Gosselin guy, but if he truly is one of the more respected evaluators of talent, #6 on the big board for a QB is pretty good. Plenty good for #1 overall. I get the point that there's not many superstars to choose from, pretty much just Green, Miller, Peterson, Dareus, but if Newton really is the 6th best prospect out of this class that's worth #1 overall. And looking at his list, I can't find much to argue with. He even has Gabbert right around where I'd have him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we draft Cam we still have to address the QB position for 2011 and potentially 2012 - this is why we shouldn't take him. If our front office is content with being bad again this year why not just tank again and get Luck.

Because Beason not going to tank. Ron R is not going to tank. It's a bigger risk thinking that you will be in position to get Luck next year.

How many times has the same team had back to Back #1 overall pick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...