Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rick Gosselin's Big Board


Murph

Recommended Posts

let's hope we don't lose here. I would rather not have to think, "well at least it only took us three years to recover from that bust." (this is true of any player we pick that busts, not just Cam)

Me too. Conversely I would also hate to say "We are still last in the NFC South but at least that guy wasn't a bust.

Basically see my avatar :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and I will be we still take Cam anyway. =|

If we draft Cam we still have to address the QB position for 2011 and potentially 2012 - this is why we shouldn't take him. If our front office is content with being bad again this year why not just tank again and get Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gosselin has Cam ranked as the 6th best player in the draft and the top QB, I can live with that.

I was going to say the same thing. I honestly am not too familiar with this Gosselin guy, but if he truly is one of the more respected evaluators of talent, #6 on the big board for a QB is pretty good. Plenty good for #1 overall. I get the point that there's not many superstars to choose from, pretty much just Green, Miller, Peterson, Dareus, but if Newton really is the 6th best prospect out of this class that's worth #1 overall. And looking at his list, I can't find much to argue with. He even has Gabbert right around where I'd have him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we draft Cam we still have to address the QB position for 2011 and potentially 2012 - this is why we shouldn't take him. If our front office is content with being bad again this year why not just tank again and get Luck.

Because Beason not going to tank. Ron R is not going to tank. It's a bigger risk thinking that you will be in position to get Luck next year.

How many times has the same team had back to Back #1 overall pick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...