Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL owners don't get it...


Jackofalltrades

Recommended Posts

Agree or not, it's a good and quick read about the lockout.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nfl-owners-are-wrong-and-dont-get-it/2011/04/26/AFPj63rE_story.html

The owners don’t get it, and haven’t from the beginning. But they better get it fast, or the entire structure of the league may come down around their ears. On Tuesday, it suddenly became clear what a doomsday scenario they put into play when they picked a financial fight with their players, and locked them out. It was a profound mistake, committed out of arrogance. While they were calculating revenue, studying profit-loss statements and betting on how many unplayed games it would take the players to fold, they should have taken a crucial fact into account: They are in the legal wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One pro union liberal judge gave the players what they want. You could tell in her statement she was very pro union not even will to admit that the owners had a defense. A more conservative court will see it in a different light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is gonna be VERY hard to overturn, the players are looking like a Charity case. The Owners locked the weight rooms (and were told to), while the players showed up for work. The NFLPA now has a lot of negotiating power, The owners dropped the ball on this one(pun intended).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is a fact that the players have legal leverage enough to force their employers to let them work in a business they ave nothing invested in we are living in a sad world.

In the end the owners hold the cards and the players know it. We may be on the verge of a very weird time in the NFL and quite possibly nearing the shear cliff its about to fall off of for good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps, but it'll be difficult to overturn.

Really as we have seen its just a opinion. She was liberal so no way in hell he was going to side with the NFL, Thats why Mediation was pointless. D.Smith knew he had it wrapped up even before then.

What she did was give a fighting rebel force more ammo. Instead of just squashing them and forcing them to negotiate.

The fact is why would Smith ever want a CBA again? If he can just bitch slap the NFL in court every time they want change then there is no point. The NFLPA or trade association will make tons of money if there is no CBA.

We will also see teams like the Bengals and the Bills fold and close up shop because they will not be able to survive in the market. Even the great Greenbay packers may have to close up camp.

Also I would like to point out that it will have the same effect on Basketball. Same effect will happen to them an so the owners will have no leverage like management should and will go right off the cliff with the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will reserve my judgement on the legal issues until all the rulings are final.

Judging by the statements several players have made, they don't get it either. By getting it, I mean owners and players don't realize that they make a lot of money based on the goodwill of the fans.

We the Fans need to start our own organization that will boycott if they dont reach a CBA. We are the most powerful party in the NFL and I would imagine no fan wants to see there team close up shop.

No one says we are obligated to buy tickets or anything. Not even those wicked PSLs do that. We could just abstain from going to all games and bring the owners and the players to there knees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bill Polian and Bill Lekas on Chalk Talks SiriusXM radio this morning.  Polian needs to retire (again). First he talks about Andy Dalton as our backup and then suggests trading down to get Sadiq. Clueless. At least he brought up the hole losing Ashawn Robinson caused.  
    • And you know this how? Stay in your lane, junior. I'm pretty sure I'm a lot older than you, am a whole lot more experienced with life, and have watched football in earnest probably longer than you've been alive. I agree, but I was talking directly about injuries. As far as the economics, I'm assuming that Moton would have to take a pay cut and would probably be compelled to if he wants to stay in Charlotte. He seems like a thoughtful and practical guy. He knows that he's getting older and realizes the nature of the business. Hell, last time there were were questions on whether he would be here the last season. Dan and Brandt were dialing up the pressure. I don't think they're going to go into any type of contractual extension discussions without having a backup plan--i.e., a person that will appear to be Moton's replacement. And, to be honest, that person may be Moton's replacement depending how things go. But, I get the impression that Moton wants to be in Charlotte (unless he's developed some undying desire to chase a championship somewhere else).
    • It would be pretty fun with something like this. 3 on 3 the first 5 minutes, 2 on 2 the next 5 minutes (after a stoppage), then 1 on 1 (after a stoppage) the rest of the way. I just feel like this would be equal parts entertaining and chaos to watch
×
×
  • Create New...