Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Beason's civil trial starts today


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

Panthers linebacker Jon Beason will be in court Monday for an incident in 2009 in which he is accused of punching a man in the face.

Gary Wright of the Charlotte Observer writes that Beason is accused in a civil trial of attacking Gregory Frye at a club after Frye told Beason’s teammate Donte Rosario that he saw Beason “up at the lake doing coke with some girl.” That remark reportedly enraged Beason.

Read more: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/09/jon-beasons-civil-trial-starts-monday/

I honestly didn't know this was still going on. Don't know if Beason really did it or not, but from all I've heard and know about this Greg Frye, he deserved it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, and I missed this comment at the end of the PFT article:

(No word on whether any charges will be brought against NFL Network for their criminal underrating of Beason in their top 100 player series.)

Can't believe I'm going to say this, but... GO PFT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they charged five bucks apiece for the chance to kick Frye in the nuts, they'd likely make a fortune off this board alone.

I'd pay 100 for that opportunity, would wear steel toe boots to make sure he can't infect the rest of society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't that Frye dude post on here?

Oh, wait, that's right.....:lol:

After the incident, some guys that said they knew him or had hung out with him posted here for a bit. There was plenty of belief that at least one of the "defenders" was actually Frye himself.

Nothing any of them said did anything to change the impression that he's a douchebag / loser / waste of oxygen / whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
×
×
  • Create New...