Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should the panthers take a look at players in the supplemental draft?


Recommended Posts

Hidden

lmao who ever said jimmy clausen had lebron james type talent? the comparison is not there at all. he doesnt have freakish size nor is not athletically gifted enuff to warrant the comparison. Lions or no Lions If some one drops from a possible first round pick to be gotten for as cheap as a 5-7 pick(whom many get cut and never make the team) I say its worth looking into.

Love him or hate him he is 6'5 230 who has shown ablity to not only throw a decent pass but make big time catches in big time games. Given the right teaching I feel he would pay off alot more than some body we draft in the fifth who may not make the team. If he enter the draft this season or next, he would not be a 6-7 round pick.

do a little research...

and they weren't talking athletic ability.. they were talking stardom.

Link to comment

lmao who ever said jimmy clausen had lebron james type talent? the comparison is not there at all. he doesnt have freakish size nor is not athletically gifted enuff to warrant the comparison. Lions or no Lions If some one drops from a possible first round pick to be gotten for as cheap as a 5-7 pick(whom many get cut and never make the team) I say its worth looking into.

Love him or hate him he is 6'5 230 who has shown ablity to not only throw a decent pass but make big time catches in big time games. Given the right teaching I feel he would pay off alot more than some body we draft in the fifth who may not make the team. If he enter the draft this season or next, he would not be a 6-7 round pick.

do a little research...

and they weren't talking athletic ability.. they were talking stardom, IIRC. (when you do the research, you can remind me exactly what they were referencing)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Janoris Jenkins. If we'll take a chance on Hogan, might as well go after Jenkins too.

Jenkins is going to play for North Alabama in '11, so he likely won't be subject for the supp draft unless he doesn't get accepted or gets booted there sometime in the next few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jenkins is going to play for North Alabama in '11, so he likely won't be subject for the supp draft unless he doesn't get accepted or gets booted there sometime in the next few weeks.

That's too bad I was really hoping Carolina would scoop him up but Mark Herzlich would be solid ... 6'4" 250 runs a 4.8 40 and former ACC defensive player of the year at BC.. Has or hopefully will have had cancer ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much more athletic than Newton? Seriously? Your right, Newton is not much of an athlete. And he has also never caught a TD pass. Right.

Slow down new guy. no one is questioning newton being athletic. As you can see by my gif i'm a big newton fan. But speaking on being an athletic i talk about in terms of speed and ablity to play a number of positions. the differnce between newton's 4.6 and pryor's 4.4 is a big gap. While newton could play tightend as could pryor,pryor could also play wr.

Coming out of highschool pryor had no position and was listed as an athlete. A blue chip at that, with the ablity to be pretty darn good at at any of those position. he's one of those big guys with basketball skills who could play on either side of the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do a little research...

and they weren't talking athletic ability.. they were talking stardom, IIRC. (when you do the research, you can remind me exactly what they were referencing)

so talent and stardom are the same thing? i swear we were talking about ability to transend the game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...