Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How long will the Observer last?


Zod

Recommended Posts

The print version will go down like most other print newspapers across the country. It's too bad. I guess I'm old fashioned, but I love reading a newspaper. I also don't understand why anyone would want the business to fold because they disagree with the newspaper's politics. I mean, are you so cynical and hard-hearted that you don't care that lot of people will be losing their livelihoods (including employees who have nothing to do with writing the allegedly liberal content)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The print version will go down like most other print newspapers across the country. It's too bad. I guess I'm old fashioned, but I love reading a newspaper. I also don't understand why anyone would want the business to fold because they disagree with the newspaper's politics. I mean, are you so cynical and hard-hearted that you don't care that lot of people will be losing their livelihoods (including employees who have nothing to do with writing the allegedly liberal content)?

I didn't say I want to put the paper out of business nor that I want people to lose their jobs, only that I did not choose to subscribe to it anymore. We all have our own opinions about politics and, while the Observer may reflect yours, it does not reflect mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to chill on Saturday and Sunday mornings and read the paper with music and coffee. I dont really read it for news, more for commentary and in-depth reporting (such as it is at the Observer). Other than that I don't have time during the week and can get news anytime anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The year he had another edge rusher opposite him in Reddick, Reddick ended up having more sacks. Burns was good at rushing the passer here but he was taken out of plays far too often by a single TE or you'd never even known he was in the game at all.  The Rams offer was equivalent to prime Khalil Mack or a TJ Watt. Those guys single handedly took over games and stopped drives. I can't remember a game Burns ever did that. Do we wish we had the level of production hes giving right now? Of course. Do I think we'd have it here. No.  At the time, his production was on par with Reddick, not Parsons. Pay production and incentivise potential. 
    • Technically our guys are in the top 6 in sacks for rookies and Scourton is tied for the lead.
    • That's why so many said he wasn't worth it here, there was only DB and it wasn't enough. If Burns is feasting then the other guys in NY are doing enough already, Burns is just collecting the stats. It's what he eas built for and is finally in his perfect space to succeed. Im not as in on the new guys yet. More is an understatement but the good news is that they are rookies.
×
×
  • Create New...