Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lockout down to Free Agency, Rookie wages.


weymouthst

Recommended Posts

Now let's hope the owners don't try another bait and switch on the revenue split.

I think the deal will get done this week because this week is the deadline for a full preseason schedule and the owners are not going to leave that preseason game money on the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me or does anyone else think JR is one of the main guys pushing for the right of refusal bs? With Johnson, Williams, Anderson, and Davis all potentially gone I just think he is the one trying to cover his ass bc of the strategy his has employed the last couple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big deal here is the majority of the disagreement seems to be under control and close to being resolved.

I am actually interested in how the rookie wages will be decided.

How much money do you think Cam should get? A 50 mil contract seems way to high for him, even though I think I would pull the trigger if the old rookie wages were in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue with a rookie salary scale is not only guaranteed money but years until they can became a free agent. Right now it costs tons of money for a top pick but at least you can lock them up for 5 years. The rookie cap needs to not only limit the money but at least lock them up for 4 years instead of the three the players want. And this agreement should include some kind of franchise tag so you can keep a franchise QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me or does anyone else think JR is one of the main guys pushing for the right of refusal bs? With Johnson, Williams, Anderson, and Davis all potentially gone I just think he is the one trying to cover his ass bc of the strategy his has employed the last couple years.

Every single team has guys that are somewhere in the 4-6 year range that they are afraid of losing for nothing, not just Carolina. Fact of the matter is players don't want right of refusal because they want their big payday, and owners want it to be able to retain their own talented players. It seems like a fairly large issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...