Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN Talking Points

Jangler

By Jangler,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

What's with all the 'rookie QB' talk. Did Clausen and Anderson get traded? Yes, we do have a rookie QB. We have several rookies, so does everyone else.

well, Matt Ryan wasn't the only QB on the Falcons roster in 08......

point is Cam unless something crazy happens will be our QB the majority of this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wade Newbie

wade

Posted
Posted

Not totally related, but I caught the tail end of Mike and Mike yesterday and Greenberg said something to the effect that he thought Clausen would start the entire year. He seems to think they'd do this in order to entice other teams to make a trade offer after this season. I really wish they just wouldn't talk Panthers when it's clear they have no idea what's going on with the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
theyhateme45 Newbie

theyhateme45

Posted
Posted

Cowherd isn't as bad as everyone makes him out to be.. I still listen to his show from time to time..

Agreed, I listen to him most days.... though he may say things you don't want to here, he usually back up his opinions with valid reasonings. I don;t always agree, but I very rarely feel like his opinions are out of wack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Not totally related, but I caught the tail end of Mike and Mike yesterday and Greenberg said something to the effect that he thought Clausen would start the entire year. He seems to think they'd do this in order to entice other teams to make a trade offer after this season. I really wish they just wouldn't talk Panthers when it's clear they have no idea what's going on with the team.

They start doing two'a'days tomorrow. Carolina and Denver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chaos Grand Master

Chaos

Posted
Posted

Just wait. Once these so-called experts see that the Panthers can score a touchdown in the preseason, they will change their tune. Until then, we are the same team that finished DFL a year ago, added no significant veterans we didn't already have on the roster, and throw in a rookie QB who has yet to prove himself at this level.

Again, shouldn't look at this through too narrow a lens. We all know that new coaches/new scheme plus our talent should equal much better results. Idiot analysts see a 2-14 team that kept its core intact, plus added a rookie QB to compete as the starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • toldozer
      Canales is holding us back

      By toldozer · Posted

      I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • frankw
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)

      By frankw · Posted

      You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • Bama Panther
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By Bama Panther · Posted

      It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...