Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tyrell Sutton


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

We have other guys that can do what Sutton does and that leaves us room to carry more guys in 1 weaker area instead of being stacked at one of our strongest, if not strongest, areas of the team. Ben Hartsock is a very good blocker. If Fiammetta went down, he would be the guy to step in. We also have a lot of young talent at WR, but also contains question marks.

So with us not having to carry 4 RBs, we will be able to carry 6 WRs. We also have Goodson, Munnerlyn, and Pilares to do returns. I think the only way Sutton makes it is if Goodson continues his fumbling problems and is either cut or traded. I also wouldn't put much stock in Vaughn starting over Sutton yesterday. It's just part of seeing what we have in other players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sutton keeps dropping the ball, dude needs to walk.

Please do us Packers fans a favor and send T-Sutt back our way. I doubt we will make the same mistake twice.

One of the least justified, most illogical cuts in Packers' history, in my opinion. If he can make a team with arguably the best running backs in the NFL, the Panthers, how could he NOT be a keeper on the Packers' roster?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please do us Packers fans a favor and send T-Sutt back our way. I doubt we will make the same mistake twice.

One of the least justified, most illogical cuts in Packers' history, in my opinion. If he can make a team with arguably the best running backs in the NFL, the Panthers, how could he NOT be a keeper on the Packers' roster?

What would the Packers be willing to trade to get Sutton?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please do us Packers fans a favor and send T-Sutt back our way. I doubt we will make the same mistake twice.

One of the least justified, most illogical cuts in Packers' history, in my opinion. If he can make a team with arguably the best running backs in the NFL, the Panthers, how could he NOT be a keeper on the Packers' roster?

Not sure why sut was 4th string yesterday but he isn't getting cut. Glad to see a Packers fan gets what some Panther fans don't. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...