Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charles Godfrey. Potential to be one of the best?


the212

Recommended Posts

In my opinion, the problem when evaluating Godfrey is the sub-par at best, and sometimes outright bad CB2 play. I'm not going to turn this into a trade for Asante Samuel thread or anything like that, but Richard Marshall was bad, and Captain could look even worse in his first year starting. Aside from getting literally ran over by Peyton Hillis last year on the goal line, I think he has been above-average in run support, and has been around the ball a lot in coverage. I just can't really form a solid opinion yet on him because he looks to be out of position too frequently, but again without watching actual game tape it's kind of hard to say if that was his fault, Marshall's fault, or somewhere in between. One good thing is that while Captain has been beat by bigger receivers, it's usually on jump balls and not outright getting burned so we should at least get a somewhat better glimpse of what Godfrey can do when he can focus solely on his own job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is no Ed Reed, but more importantly I think he might be a good solid starter for us this year. We'll see he's had some dumbass play and has been the beneficiary of some really fortunate plays that lead to his interceptions. In fact what I don't like about Godfrey is that the past three seasons when I see him intercepting the ball it doesn't ever look like he is doing it because of great skill or great understanding of the play around him. Instead it looks like luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is hard to judge Godfrey in this system until we seem him play. I think he was below average in coverage in the cover 2. He always seemed to be late to the ball. He covered the run well, which shows me he can cover angles and get to the ball. I hope he shows better coverage skills in the new defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers under a cover 2 have been more reactive v. aggressive. As a result, our corners and safeties have to maintain coverage longer. It will be a different story with a more attacking front line. I have always liked Godfrey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He makes some mistakes but a lot of his faults last year was covering Marshall's ass.

Was this ever definitively proven or is it just something we want to believe?

Cause I totally want to agree with this but I'm not sure it really can be heaped up on Marshall like that. Despite his substandard play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...