Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charles Godfrey. Potential to be one of the best?


the212

Recommended Posts

In my opinion, the problem when evaluating Godfrey is the sub-par at best, and sometimes outright bad CB2 play. I'm not going to turn this into a trade for Asante Samuel thread or anything like that, but Richard Marshall was bad, and Captain could look even worse in his first year starting. Aside from getting literally ran over by Peyton Hillis last year on the goal line, I think he has been above-average in run support, and has been around the ball a lot in coverage. I just can't really form a solid opinion yet on him because he looks to be out of position too frequently, but again without watching actual game tape it's kind of hard to say if that was his fault, Marshall's fault, or somewhere in between. One good thing is that while Captain has been beat by bigger receivers, it's usually on jump balls and not outright getting burned so we should at least get a somewhat better glimpse of what Godfrey can do when he can focus solely on his own job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is no Ed Reed, but more importantly I think he might be a good solid starter for us this year. We'll see he's had some dumbass play and has been the beneficiary of some really fortunate plays that lead to his interceptions. In fact what I don't like about Godfrey is that the past three seasons when I see him intercepting the ball it doesn't ever look like he is doing it because of great skill or great understanding of the play around him. Instead it looks like luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is hard to judge Godfrey in this system until we seem him play. I think he was below average in coverage in the cover 2. He always seemed to be late to the ball. He covered the run well, which shows me he can cover angles and get to the ball. I hope he shows better coverage skills in the new defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers under a cover 2 have been more reactive v. aggressive. As a result, our corners and safeties have to maintain coverage longer. It will be a different story with a more attacking front line. I have always liked Godfrey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He makes some mistakes but a lot of his faults last year was covering Marshall's ass.

Was this ever definitively proven or is it just something we want to believe?

Cause I totally want to agree with this but I'm not sure it really can be heaped up on Marshall like that. Despite his substandard play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bleacher Report trade and mock has us trading to 9 and picking SG Brayden Burries Charlotte Hornets recieve: Kyrie Irving and No. 9 pick Dallas Mavericks receive: LaMelo Ball, No. 14 pick and No. 18 pick The Hornets just finished their sixth season with Ball. It was only their second with a winning record, their sixth without a playoff trip and the sixth in which someone else paced them in win shares (Kon Knueppel this time around). While they'd surely like to keep building on their second-half momentum, maybe they're just unconvinced that Ball can lead a winning team. Maybe they credit that stretch run less to him and more to the addition of Knueppel, the ascension of Brandon Miller and some out-of-nowhere gains on the defensive end.   Charlotte should be dreaming big right now, and perhaps it believes a steadier hand at point guard is needed to realize that. Or maybe it feels it needs a little more time to bring everything together and thinks that task would be simpler without Ball's money on the books and with a top-10 pick in a loaded draft instead of two selections in the mid-teens.   Either way, this shakeup works. Short-term, a healthy Irving should be far easier to follow than Ball. You may not always know if Irving is playing, but you know what you'll get if he does: elite shotmaking, all-time handles, offensive ingenuity and the ability to work both on and off the ball. He could show this young roster what's required to win for a year or two (he has a $42.4 million player option for 2027-28) or even stick around longer if the partnership proves especially fruitful.   The Hornets also add a building block in Burries, who offers both plug-and-play polish and flashes of shot-creation that hint at star potential. In short, they could better their chances of winning both now and in the future while collecting both the best player in the trade and the highest draft pic
    • I'd hire him in a heartbeat. Hell if he wanted the job, I'd have Canales packing his poo right now and I don't dislike Canales. It's just that firing a 106-58 coach is crazy work. That's a 65% winning percentage. That's the equivalent of averaging 11 wins a season. That's incomprehensible for a fanbase That's never experienced back to back winning seaons.
×
×
  • Create New...