Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton starter vs Bengals, Week 1 starter TBD


Sword

Recommended Posts

meh I think broke even is overly critical. The addition of the two tight ends, along with the new coaches, counters any lost quarterback play IMO. I think we're going to have a better offense overall, though it might not be as much as many of us would like.

Shockey being an upgrade is debatable.

Olsen is legit.

We also lost a #2 receiver in Gettis and haven't replaced him.

I haven't seen anything out of the new offense that gives me any more hope than last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is what I am expecting for the Bengals game:

1) Play-calling a bit more realistic as far as being like a regular-season game.

2) The run game to actually be consistent, picking up about 4 yards a pop to supplement the pass game.

3) Defense to be a lot better. Not as much blitzing as we will see week 1, but more than last week. There will be drives where we won't blitz much or at all, just to continue evaluation on our DL.

4) Mare to not miss any FGs.

5) Me to be really drunk.

If all 5 of those things happen, I will feel a lot better about this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a good indication that Cam will start. I personally think there's more benefit in starting Anderson over Clausen. Cam can actually learn from Anderson playing unlke Jimmy. But Newton should be week 1 starter and I have been all for it. He has more upside than Jimmy and gives us a better chance to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's what we said last year with Clausen, LOL

actually this time last year people thought the bengals were pretty good. they won the AFCN in 2009 IIRC

now? they'll probably go 0-16, they don't have one decent player on that team anymore. not one

i hope luck goes there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't matter, we are still a lot worse than many of us thought we would be this year, including myself.

I'm hunkering down for a long year...stocking up on lots of beer....

I'm still expecting around 4-12. I'll admit the first preseason game got my hopes a bit higher, but eh. We'll improve, that's all I can ask for.

Shockey being an upgrade is debatable.

Olsen is legit.

We also lost a #2 receiver in Gettis and haven't replaced him.

I haven't seen anything out of the new offense that gives me any more hope than last year.

True about Gettis, but Olsen more than makes up for that if we want to do some weird twisted playing weighting by expected contribution. I don't think you can debate the upgrade in the passing game from Shockey either, even if you put most of that emphasis on a coordinator that thinks they are more than just additional lineman. Also, I personally think AE's growth will have some effect this year, and while it won't counter the loss of Gettis, it'll be another plus. Overall we're still weak past Smitty at pure receivers, but overall our passing game looks much stronger than it did last season because of the addition of the tight ends and (hopefully) a better system.

Our running game may actually take a hit though - Chuds was often criticized in Cleveland for not running enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they blocked me, they couldn't try to make funny comments not relating to football.

If they blocked me they would have nothing to post about

Yep he's the evil cam hater this board loves to hate. No reason to block you, you haven't done anything to me. Infact, some of the stuff you come up with isn't all poppycock. It's just if there is a thread about cam i already know what you ll say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wonder if they'd consider trading Rasheed Walker to a team that needs tackle help but missed out in the draft?
    • LOL. This is such a Panthers fan take.  Anyone who falls to us must suck because some other team didn't take them before.  We got lucky with Lemon, Thieneman, and Freeling all falling to us (honestly any of the three is a A+) but the WR and S positions are much deeper than the LT position in this draft.  We got the LT w/ the most upside at 19.  Mauigoa played RT in college and some think he is a guard in the nfl.  Spano played RT in college and some think he is a guard in the NFL due to short arms.  Blake Miller played RT in college and is not as good as Freeling.  Proctor is a true LT but his ability to handle quick edge's worries me (see Icky).  Freeling is a true LT and a gifted pass protector.  Many think he has a very high ceiling and will benefit from not having to start right away.  This is how you build a franchise.  
    • After watching Cam get killed for years behind a bad Oline and having to watch the 2021 and 2023 Olines I will never complain about this team putting resources into that spot.  We got a true LT who could really push Rasheed Walker for the day 1 job. Go back and watch Iceky's draft profile from 2022 and all the talk was Ickey would be an all-pro guard in a zone blocking scheme, but he could play LT in a gap power run scheme. That's why Ickey looked really good when Wilks took over and we just started running gap run plays and just mauled people up front but under Canales we've been more of a zone running team. Ickey can survive at LT with his pass blocking but his true strength will always be his ability to just move guys in the run game and that's a skill set that's better used at guard.  Take another OT later on day 3 to learn from Moton to take over RT in a couple of years and let Walker and Freeling battle it out for the day 1 LT job then next offseason trade one of Hunt of Lewis and let Ickey move inside to guard. 
×
×
  • Create New...