Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton starter vs Bengals, Week 1 starter TBD


Sword

Recommended Posts

I don't mean wrong call in the short term. I am just saying right now he may be a little Clausen so if you are going by where they are at this exact moment it probably should have been Clausen. But it was pretty close and Cam is the future

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the benchmark to prove Cam hasn't proven himself in the eyes of the coaches?

being named the starter for the regular season today like Riversa said he would...?

unless you're going to argue that Jimmy has been so impressive he's made the call tough for Rivera.

Probably the right call in the long run but maybe the wrong call in the short turn. But I think Cam should be the guy unless he completely poo's the bed on Thursday

yup... that's what it'll be. I think we could have gone a few more weeks with Clausen but it was only a matter of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In week 4, teams play almost exclusively scrubs, so I don't know that we will learn much against the Steelers.

It's possible with the abbreviated camps etc this year starters may play a little more Game 4 of the PS. With that being said if Cam has a good 1st quarter Game 4 it wouldn't surprise me if Rivera pulls him out on a positive note. :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup.

To be devils advocate, maybe they know what they are going to get with Clausen and this is Cam's last shot to secure the starting role.

I think you are basically right, but I don't think he has to be exceptional by any stretch to win the role. Basically they feel confident they know what they get with Clausen from preseason games and practice but Cam is a bit inconsistent so they would like to get him more time with a gameplan around him to see how he does

Link to comment
Share on other sites

being named the starter today like Riversa said he would all along...?

The offense in general was ineffective against in Miami, and that made it difficult to evaluate the rookie QB. The point of naming a week 1 starter this week was for the preparation for Thursday's "dress" rehearsal, and they will still get to have that mock period in which they can prepare for thursday as if it were a regular season game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It depends on what version of bad we are getting. Can't have the locker room tearing apart over it.
    • I think that depends more on how high our pick is. If we have the 1st, 2nd or even 3rd pick i think we are drafting a QB rather than shopping FA market for a QB1. Curious if we’d be reluctant to start a rookie QB week 1 though. 
    • Hurney 2.0 and Fitts were so bad I don't know if it was intentional or they were that abysmally clueless. Fittershits panicked repeatedly being on the back end of positional runs while Hurney couldn't evaluate anyone outside of the 1st.  I can't figure out why Plummer still has a jersey. There's no reason. Dalton brings nothing to the table. If another QB gets cut that has given a glimmer of anything better than what we have, we should look, and that goes for every position.  I cant get over how much different this team could have been with a competent GM and having accepted the Rams offer for Burns. This franchise could have gone in a totally different direction. 
×
×
  • Create New...