Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rank the following QB performances over 3 weeks from best to worst


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

A: 21 of 52 for 275 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 1 rushing TD

B: 11 of 20 for 121 yards, 0 TDs, 1 INTs

C: 27 of 49 for 270 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs

D: 26 of 46 for 255 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 1 rushing TD

E: 25 of 46 for 308 yards, 1 TD, 3 INTs

F: 19 of 32 for 280 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT

G: 5 of 14 for 79 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs

H: 32 of 52 for 277 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT

I: 28 of 55 for 226 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT

J: 11 of 24 for 80 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs

K: 20 of 42 for 228 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs

Analyze the stats, rank them, and I'll reveal which quarterback matches up with which performance when I get some responses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fug it, I hate it when people draw things out when I'm not the one doing the drawing out, so I'll just answer it.

Here's how some great quarterbacks from the past decade did through Week 3 of their rookie preseason plus our very own Cam Newton:

A: 21 of 52 for 275 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 1 rushing TD (Cam Newton)

B: 11 of 20 for 121 yards, 0 TDs, 1 INTs (Michael Vick)

C: 27 of 49 for 270 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs (Sam Bradford)

D: 26 of 46 for 255 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 1 rushing TD (Josh Freeman)

E: 25 of 46 for 308 yards, 1 TD, 3 INTs (Matthew Stafford)

F: 19 of 32 for 280 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT (Mark Sanchez)

G: 5 of 14 for 79 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs (Philip Rivers)

H: 32 of 52 for 277 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT (Matt Ryan)

I: 28 of 55 for 226 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (Joe Flacco)

J: 11 of 24 for 80 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs (Aaron Rodgers)

K: 20 of 42 for 228 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs (Eli Manning)

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C: 27 of 49 for 270 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs

D: 26 of 46 for 255 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 1 rushing TD

I: 28 of 55 for 226 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT

A: 21 of 52 for 275 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 1 rushing TD

H: 32 of 52 for 277 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT

F: 19 of 32 for 280 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT

B: 11 of 20 for 121 yards, 0 TDs, 1 INTs

G: 5 of 14 for 79 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs

J: 11 of 24 for 80 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs

K: 20 of 42 for 228 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs

E: 25 of 46 for 308 yards, 1 TD, 3 INTs

Analyze the stats, rank them, and I'll reveal which quarterback matches up with which performance when I get some responses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good post. It really reinforces that we have to be patient, as some of the answers really surprised me.

My bottom 2 were Philip Rivers and Aaron Rodgers, two guys that are obviously great QB's.

I penalized heavily for turnovers and that is not always fair...case in point, if your receiver tips a ball they should have caught and it gets picked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without actually watching the games in question and seeing what happened in them, or hell, knowing ANY of the context of this stuff, it's impossible to say anything about these numbers.

This does well to show that you shouldn't really give a poo about the stats a player collects in the preseason, but it does matter how a player plays in the preseason, something stats don't always reflect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fug it, I hate it when people draw things out when I'm not the one doing the drawing out, so I'll just answer it.

Here's how some great quarterbacks from the past decade did through Week 3 of their rookie preseason plus our very own Cam Newton:

A: 21 of 52 for 275 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 1 rushing TD (Cam Newton)

B: 11 of 20 for 121 yards, 0 TDs, 1 INTs (Michael Vick)

C: 27 of 49 for 270 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs (Sam Bradford)

D: 26 of 46 for 255 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 1 rushing TD (Josh Freeman)

E: 25 of 46 for 308 yards, 1 TD, 3 INTs (Matthew Stafford)

F: 19 of 32 for 280 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT (Mark Sanchez)

G: 5 of 14 for 79 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs (Philip Rivers)

H: 32 of 52 for 277 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT (Matt Ryan)

I: 28 of 55 for 226 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (Joe Flacco)

J: 11 of 24 for 80 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs (Aaron Rodgers)

K: 20 of 42 for 228 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs (Eli Manning)

Thoughts?

1.Cam Newton,Michael Vick,Sam Bradford,Josh Freeman,Matthew Stafford,Mark Sanchez, and Eli Manning dont belong on an list of Great quarterbacks at this time. Some of them may end up on one at some point in time.

2 Matt Ryan, Joe Flacco, Phillip Rivers, and Aaron Rodgers have at least earned the right for greatness to be discussed.

3 3 preseason games worth of stats is nowhere near enough to make any kind of sane judgement about how a qb is going to do.

4 Cam Newton based on his performance to date is not ready to start. That does not mean I dont't think he will be a good qb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I work with social emotional learning and I don't know why a player with all the tools (to Snow's point) sucks when he was a top 10 player in college.  It is not talent, and it is usually not due to some learning disability-.  It comes down to dispositions or emotions in a lot of cases. The reason I pointed out Simmons in particular is because he was drafted to be a DC's new weapon.  I have friends who played in the NFL and they talk about the amount they throw at you--and those were guys who played 1 position.  Simmons shows his ability on special teams--where you are a bit more turned loose than scripted or forced to read blocking schemes or pass routes, etc.  See ball, get ball.  Simmons has been tried at CB, nickel, S , LB edge and he has had 5 different coordinators if you do not count the STs guy.  This would overwhelm most people.  Nobody knows what it does to your confidence and motivation to go from the best player on your team and a top college player to getting cut.   I just think that players like this can be saved.  To say, "He just isn't good" is not to answer the question, "Why was this not noticed during the interviews?  game film?  Combine?  References?  etc.  No, there has to be something more to it than that.  I think Isaiah needs one job and that job should be aligned with a strength.  If he fails then, fine.  Maybe he lost his mojo.  Maybe he never had it.  But to understand what he has been through is to give the guy the benefit of the doubt.  If you played in high school, you got a happy meal version of what it is like in college.  College was an appetizer when compared to pros.  We shall see.  But I am more optimistic about Simmons than I am XL.  Simmons was asked to things most NFL players cannot do.  XL just needs to catch the damn ball in bounds.   Middle schoolers do it every day.
    • This was a super interesting analysis....and I will say I dont think it prevents us from looking at Safety in the draft. IF Ransom takes a step up and outplays Moehrig, there is an out for them after the year as a potential cap cut.  EVEN if not, if you are right and Simmons shows some promise as a Big nickel and Moehrig gets  injured and Ransom looks good (or even if Moehrig looks bad) I could see him being a cap casualty in 2027 as long as we feel we have enough talent there as starting potential.  Lotta football to play and Lotta injuries to happen.  Im hopeful because his measurables are through the roof, but unless they translate you still gotta go with what you got.
    • He’s a leader on this defense. Sometimes you need a guy because he makes those around him better. Talent wise he is a career backup but he’s part of the fabric of this d that’s already gelled.  If you bring in all these new pieces without some of the established leadership you have a lack of focus. This is a good signing. 
×
×
  • Create New...