Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gamble


Jackofalltrades

Recommended Posts

Although he had help over the top I though he did a very good job on Fitz, only gave up three receptions to perhaps the best WR in the game.

He also had a couple of nice tackles against the run right around the LOS. Impressed with him, really thought Fitz would kill us.

Secondary as a whole played pretty well if you take away the blown coverages. Better than I anticipated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He played well but that last completion he gave up was inexcusable... I could see that poo coming before the ball was even snapped. There was no question they were going to Fitz and Gamble let him run right by....

that last completion was NOT Gamble's fault.

He got a decent jam at the LOS and was right there with Fitz. It was a beautifully thrown ball and the safety was late coming over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that last completion was NOT Gamble's fault.

He got a decent jam at the LOS and was right there with Fitz. It was a beautifully thrown ball and the safety was late coming over.

He wasn't right there or he could have made a play on the ball....Fitz had him beat by two steps. Maybe that's nitpicking but for as much money as Gamble is getting paid I think it's fair to nitpick....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He played well but that last completion he gave up was inexcusable... I could see that poo coming before the ball was even snapped. There was no question they were going to Fitz and Gamble let him run right by....

Fitz runs by a lot of people. You have to have help on that type of route and the help got there late. Not that Gamble played well on that play, but with a guy like Fitz, you just hope to contain him, you can't really shut him down.

Fwiw, the play turned out to be irrelevant anyway. We still got the ball in scoring position with plenty of time, but failed to get it in the endzone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wasn't right there or he could have made a play on the ball....Fitz had him beat by two steps. Maybe that's nitpicking but for as much money as Gamble is getting paid I think it's fair to nitpick....

He WAS right there with Fitz....the BEST WR in the game.

Your expectation of a corner completely shutting down the best WR in the game on every play is laughable. You MUST have saftey help on that route...and Sherod Martin was late coming over.

Gamble did a very nice job on Fitz today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Comments look just like the huddle.
    • Nina King continues to run circles around the rest of college basketball. She's been ahead of the curve on everything, and is the biggest reason for Duke's success post-K IMO. I think Scheyer is great at many things, but Duke went into the NIL era 100% ready whereas everyone else was playing catchup. 
    • Happy they won convincingly instead of letting them hang around. Montreal is cooked, and rather than play hockey, they've decided to take some really cheap shots at guys. I get a player may feel a need to set the tone, and I understand how that works. But to 2-hand cross check someone intentionally in the face, to have a guy down on the ice and put his head into the ice with a stick, to just start punching anyone who gets within arm's reach- that's not setting the tone. That is nothing short of playing dirty.  That said, the Canes.... oh boy. They could have run this score to 6-0 with half a power play. It's embarrassing how bad the PP is. If the Canes go to the Cup finals against a team who scores at least 1 goal per game on the PP, they'll lose the close games because of the lack of results on the PP. 
×
×
  • Create New...