Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Analysis of Newton's first game from Marshall Faulk and Warren Sapp on NFL Network (featured on Panthers.com)

Newton impressive but can still improve

Interesting on a couple of points.

First off, I didn't know Marshall Faulk was a big Newton doubter. He talks in this clip like he was, but now believed Newton can play in the NFL.

Of more interest to me though, are the comments of Warren Sapp, for this reason.

Warren Sapp had a profound effect on the career of Donovan McNabb not with a tackle or a sack, but with words. Prior to a playoff game between the Bucs and Eagles, Sapp called McNabb "a runningback who throws". McNabb didn't like the designation, but he let it get into his head. He wanted to be seen as a passer, not a runner. And he went into the Bucs game determined to show that he could win with his arm, not just his legs.

Before that game, McNabb was never shy about taking off and running. This time though, you could see him passing up clear opportunities to run and instead trying to pass. Announcers noticed and commented on it and how it hindered the Eagles offense, and they ended up losing. The Bucs went on to the Super Bowl.

The effects of Sapp's words went beyond that game though. Sapp was a master of mind games as a player, and this was arguably his most brilliant moment. For years after the words had been said, people could see McNabb passing up opportunities to run, apparently still trying to prove he was a passer, not a runner. And analysts argued more than once about whether that mindset cost the Eagles games.

Having long since retired, Sapp has no reason to play mind games with anyone anymore.

So what does he have to say to Newton?

Watch the clip and see for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna disagree here.

In week one, I didn't think I saw any times where Newton passed up running opportunities. I did see him being a patient passer, which is good and will hold him in good stead if he keeps it up. Granted, that's a fairly subjective thing, but for me it wasn't there.

Truth be told, there is a fine line between being "pass first" and missing opportunities where running would actually be the smart thing to do.

Coaches generally don't like to have their quarterbacks run much because quarterbacks who run are quarterbacks who get hurt. That said, I'm not sure Rivera and Chudzinski are afraid of that. They don't seem like the type to be averse to risk. That can be a good thing, but it can also come back to bite you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now Cam is operating with a pared down playbook which is being added to each week. Not necessarily because he can't handle it but they have had 6 weeks to install the whole offense. I suspect that they are added specific plays for every opponent and then some situationally for where they are on the field. So I would expect to see more redzone plays and options over the next few weeks as well as more planned rollouts and bootlegs.

THis offense is a work in progress and will be for the next several months. So there is a lot of room for improvement across the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree with Sapp.

also, I can't recall any players outside of the goaline stand....that Carolina actually designed a play where Newton was pretty much designed to run. All have runs have been after all his option were exhausted or he just felt running made the most sense ( the option not to throw to Smitty in the preseaosn).

I think Carolina could do a better job designing his legs to present a bigger problem for defenses. Still seems like Carolina wants thim to be a pocket passer.....need a little more running from Cam (whether it be his choice or clear intent from coaches and not just being the result of desperation)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...