Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How to game-plan Newton? - NFP


Cyberjag

Recommended Posts

I think GB will do exactly what AZ did .....they both run the same schemes essentially. GB is simply more established and has better players.....which means they will find success at times when AZ didn't.

still think Stewart needs more reps than Williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arizona mixed up coverages last Sunday particularly in the second half. That recipe to stop Newton is what defenses do to stop all good quarterbacks it is hardly earth shattering. As for will it work, lets see. Newton threw it deep to Smith because he had single coverage on the outside. If they were doubling Smith, Newton would have gone elsewhere.

One of the issues that they don't address is what happens if you put your safeties deep and go with man coverage or blitz your linebackers from the middle of the field. It opens up the run game which the 3-4 is vulnerable to in the first place. I would think a major strategy against Green Bay would be to run often, control the clock and keep Rodgers off the field. I doubt we will be wanting to get into a shoot out with Green Bay. Newton may not get the big yards in the air against Green Bay but that could be as much by design as it is due to Green Bay's defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read we went with 2 TE sets over half the snaps vs Ari.

Can't confirm or deny that, but I will say I wouldn't be surprised if it were true and for a couple of reasons. First of all, Rivera said in his post-game presser that if he were Ray Horton, he would have done the exact same thing (meaning bring a ton of pressure). The 2 TE set is incredibly useful in increasing protection for obvious reasons and Rivera had to know a bunch of pressure was coming. The other thing Rivera said was that if the OL gives Cam time, well, you saw what he could do. They definitely wanted to give him time to make plays and the 2 TE set serves that purpose beautifully.

Secondly, we have the 2 best TEs we've had here since Wesley Walls. Hell yeah, get both those guys on the field at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A fair amount of what he described is stuff that the Packers tend to do on a regular basis anyway.

Capers looooves to confuse opposing quarterbacks, and not just the rookies.

I wouldn't be terribly surprised if they use pretty much the same game plan the Cardinals did (just with better personnel)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear ya. I would say from what I've seen of Rivera, I'm not sure it's possible for him to love winning and hate losing any more than he already does.

I'm thinking about the players myself, not wanting to disappoint Rivera.

They let one get away, and now they have a chance to redeem against the champs, who may be looking past us.

Rivera's mentality towards winning has not changed. He's just that focused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking about the players myself, not wanting to disappoint Rivera.

They let one get away, and now they have a chance to redeem against the champs, who may be looking past us.

Rivera's mentality towards winning has not changed. He's just that focused.

Makes sense.

Rivera is so focused that Frosted Mini Wheats think he should ease up a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pull up the Packers - Eagles playoff game. Go from there.

Yep. I expect a lot of teams will look at defending Vick as a template for defending Newton.

Not sure how well it'll work though. Newton can see the field way better than Vick ever could. And he seems to be a more dedicated student of the game than Vick was starting out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of young QB's struggle with holding on to the ball top long. He has gotten better progressively in that regard. Pocket Time(in Sec):  2.5(2023), 2.3(2024), 2.2(2025) Time to Throw(in Sec): 2.9(2023), 2.79(2024), 2.82(2025) The divedends have been fairly small, is the issue.
    • I'm firing DC, though I think it actually makes the job less attractive. He's not prepared to be a HC and it's showed. A new HC is not going to be tied automatically to BY. He's going to want to bring in some level of competition in the QB room because anyone who has ever watched football knows our QB room is lacking. If he doesn't, that tells a more interesting tale of who's really calling the shots.  Dave hasn't been decisive enough in game and that leadership council BS has trust fall vibes. Our offense has been pathetically stale and vanilla. Our run game while good has made no sense based on who has been playing best. Our defense is improved but they can't be expected to hold opposing teams to below 17 a game because our offense can't score consistently.  We've beaten some teams we shouldn't have beaten, specifically GB and the Rams, and I think our record doesn’t accurately reflect where the team and the coaching really is. We've fallen flat against a geriatric rookie QB leading a 2-10 NO team and got our ass handed to us TWICE. We're unprepared for the biggest games.  This is what happens though when real coaching candidates turn down interviews because your owner is a narcissistic butthole. You get someone no one else bothered to call and you get the results everyone else would have expected if they had. 
    • The Saints would be 2-12 if not for us. We are 50% of their wins. A organization serious about the playoffs does not get bullied by a sh*t team like the Saints TWICE. It's over my brotha. 
×
×
  • Create New...