Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NO Notice for Jacksonville?

chknwing

By chknwing,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

The Jags aren't leaving Jacksonville for a while. The Raiders and Chargers are more likely. This was brought up in all three threads about Jags vs Panthers...

How sure are you about this....would you say about as sure as Luke McCown being able to be an average QB...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted

How sure are you about this....would you say about as sure as Luke McCown being able to be an average QB...

I said he could be, and he showed he could be. Look at week 1, average, right? Just looked it up, and I definitely wrote that even LM can be an average QB. Nice try though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

I said he could be, and he showed he could be. Look at week 1, average, right? Just looked it up, and I definitely wrote that even LM can be an average QB. Nice try though.

So you don't think Garrard could do better then 17-24 for 175 and no tds....because you said McCown was better then Garrard....I know Garrard could do better then 6-19 for 54 yards and 4 ints....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted

So you don't think Garrard could do better then 17-24 for 175 and no tds....because you said McCown was better then Garrard....I know Garrard could do better then 6-19 for 54 yards and 4 ints....

At least the Jets have a good defense. David Garrard has had a 0 TD 4 interception game against the Texans of years past before. THE TEXANS! He has 18 games with an interception or more, and 0 TDS, let alone over 25 games with more picks than TDS. Anybody could have gone out there and POTENTIALLY done better, but we won't know because he was cut. He deserved to be cut, and should have been cut a year before.

I get it, you don't follow the Jaguars so you don't understand or read all the updates and keep up with all their news. I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Herb Enthusiast

Herb

Posted
Posted

The Jags aren't leaving Jacksonville for a while. The Raiders and Chargers are more likely. This was brought up in all three threads about Jags vs Panthers...

Jacksonville Jaguars are the least profitable franchise out of all 32 teams. They're also bleeding money lately. The value of the team has gone down over $150 million in the past few years. While it is unlikely they'll be moving anytime soon because of the way their lease is structured, if things continue to go south (and they very well may) then Weaver may have no other choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted

Jacksonville Jaguars are the least profitable franchise out of all 32 teams. They're also bleeding money lately. The value of the team has gone down over $150 million in the past few years. While it is unlikely they'll be moving anytime soon because of the way their lease is structured, if things continue to go south (and they very well may) then Weaver may have no other choice.

We just got a deal done last season for naming rights on our stadium and the wording makes it near impossible to get out of over the next three years. On top of that we went and just set the record for most season tickets purchased compared to the previous season. These two facts state that we got corporate money coming in and then we got fans to start purchasing season tickets.

There are multiple articles out there stating why it is hard for a team like the Jaguars or the Bills to move and why it makes way too much sense for the Chargers or the Raiders to be the team that gets moved. I won't go into it but others can look it up if they like.

So while people can want to trash the Jaguars, overall they have a better record since coming into the league than the Panthers do, our fans are starting to show support, and there is no way we go to LA. Claim the Jags will be moved soon, fine. But it won't be LA. That is stupid talk that just can't happen. If another city wants a team four years from now, it could be us. LA WILL NOT BE THE JAGUARS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...