Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith haters!

riddel

By riddel,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

riddel Newbie

riddel

Posted
Posted

I could careless about the "I told you so" part of this. My problem is that so many of you half arse fans quit on a guy who did nothing but give his all and prove time and time again that he was the "real deal". If you said Smith was done or was not a top WR, then you should really apologize. REALLY.

Players do read this board and you haters should let him know what morons you all are for quitting on him.

For the mod that closed the other thread....go ahead and ban me...you're an asshole for closing that thread. The sell out fans who sold Steve Smith down the river deserve to relive their ignorant statements.

Good day!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Razzy Newbie

Razzy

Posted
Posted

Was anyone here really hating on Smitty? I don't think any Panther fan dislikes him. I would've have been frustrated too if I had Jimmy Pickles for a QB and I had his talents. At least Delhomme could throw a deep ball. Sure, 89 has lost a step, but he is far from done. He is an extremely smart player and great at finding ways to beat the coverage.

This scenario will happen once again this Sunday: Cam drops back then rolls out. Smith let's up just enough to get the coverage to creep up to protect from the rush, then bursts away from the CB. Cam completes a deep ball to 89 in the red zone. When it does you will think of this post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted

What i found entertaining is the majority felt a 3rd round pick was worth shipping steve smith off to another team.

A third round pick.

Ya couldn't even draft a replacement for that. But they felt that would improve the team.

I doubt many will come forth, and i'm certainly not going to search old posts on my driod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
riddel Newbie

riddel

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I doubt many will come forth, and i'm certainly not going to search old posts on my driod.

I done done it......I bumped the thread and nearly got banned for it...guess the idiots who were saying to trade Smith must be mods or something....the thread is now closed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...